Meeting
  City Logo

AGENDA

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL

 

 
    Tuesday, November 23, 2021

10:00 AM


JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

ROOM 340, CITY HALL

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com
 
President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
  BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
  NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT VACANT, Tenth District
  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
  KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
  JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District

PUBLIC COMMENT
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, and due to concerns over Covid-19, the City Council will take all public comment by teleconference.

CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CABLE TELEVISION CHANNEL 35 AND ON THE INTERNET AT: HTTPS://CLERK.LACITY.ORG/CALENDAR. LIVE COUNCIL MEETINGS CAN ALSO BE HEARD AT: (213) 621-CITY (METRO), (818) 904-9450 (VALLEY), (310) 471-CITY (WESTSIDE) AND (310) 547-CITY (SAN PEDRO AREA)

Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting, press *9 to request to speak.

Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information located on page 2 of this agenda.

Telecommunication Relay Services

Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications.

Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.

What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.

Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.

For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.

SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL

 

BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or ethics.commission@lacity.org.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.

 

Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Tuesday, November 23, 2021
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items Noticed for Public Hearing

(1)
21-1235
CD 5
HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at Chief LA, located at 714 North La Cienega Boulevard.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:

  1. DETERMINE that the issuance of a liquor license at Chief LA, located at 714 North La Cienega Boulevard, will serve the Public Convenience or Necessity and will not tend to create a law enforcement problem.
     
  2. GRANT the Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at Chief LA, located at 714 North La Cienega Boulevard.
     
  3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit this determination to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control as required findings under Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4.
 

Applicant:  Carolyn Childers, CEO, Project 1972, Inc., dba Chief

Representative:  Bruce Ehrlich

  TIME LIMIT FILE - JANUARY 17, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JANUARY 14, 2022)
 
(2)
21-1313
CD 12
MOTION (LEE - KREKORIAN) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing one or more series of revenue bonds or other obligations in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $95,000,000 to finance, refinance, or reimburse the cost of acquiring, developing, improving, installing, equipping, and furnishing the real properties and improvements located at 20801 Rinaldi Street, 11023 Lurline Avenue, 11022 and 11052 Independence Avenue, 11047 and 11049 De Soto Avenue, and 20845 and 20855 Rinaldi Street.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. APPROVE the issuance of bonds by the California Enterprise Development Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $95,000,000 to finance, refinance, or reimburse the cost of acquiring, developing, improving, installing, equipping, and furnishing the real properties and improvements located at 20801 Rinaldi Street, 11023 Lurline Avenue, 11022 and 11052 Independence Avenue, 11047 and 11049 De Soto Avenue, and 20845 and 20855 Rinaldi Street in Council District 12.
  2. HOLD a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) public  hearing on Tuesday, November 23, 2021 at 10:00 a.m., located at 200 North Spring Street, Room 340, Los Angeles and ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION.
 
 

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(3)
19-1194
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to accepting a grant award for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Dispute Resolution Program from the County of Los Angeles Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services for the period of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

 
  1. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to approve the Standard Agreement with the County of Los Angeles Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
     
  2. ACCEPT funding in the amount of $137,810 from the County of Los Angeles Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services to maintain operations.
     
  3. APPROVE the City cash and in-kind match in the amount of $34,453 for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.
     
  4. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
     
    1. Establish a receivable within Fund No. 368 in the amount of $137,810 from the County of Los Angeles.
       
    2. Establish a new appropriation account within Fund No. 368 as follows:
       
      1. Account No. 12V702 - DRP RJ Grant - $137,810.
         
    3. Transfer $92,679 from Fund No. 368, Account No. 12V702 to Fund No. 100/12, Account No. 001010, Salaries, General.
       
    4. Upon receipt of grant funds, transfer up to $40,379 from Fund No. 368, Account No. 12V702 to Fund No. 100/12, Revenue Account No. 5346, Related Cost Reimbursements from Grants.
       
  5. AUTHORIZE the City Attorney, or designee, to prepare Controller instructions for any necessary technical adjustments, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO finds that the grant complies with the City financial policies as follows: The total cost of FY 2021-22 Dispute Resolution Program Restorative Justice is $172,263, of which $137,810 will be reimbursed by the County of Los Angeles Department of Workforce Development, Aging and Community Services. The match requirement of $34,453 will be satisfied through partial related costs ($15,700) included in the 2021-22 Adopted City Budget and volunteer hours ($18,753). The recommendations in this report are in compliance with the City's Financial Policies in that budgeted appropriations will be balanced against grant receipts. Community Impact Statement: None submitted 
 
 
(4)
13-1301-S4
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to acceptance of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Securing The Cities (STC) Grant Program, notification of application, and request for authority to accept a cooperative agreement. 
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to:
     
    1. Accept on behalf of the City of Los Angeles, the Securing the Cities Program Sustainment FY 2021 Budget Period 2 (FY21 STC) award in the amount of $775,000 from the US Department of Homeland Security-Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction for the period effective from September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2030.
       
    2. Negotiate and execute amendments to the Memorandum of Agreements, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, for distribution of grant funds in accordance with budget allocations for the FY21 STC with the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) for contract amounts not to exceed amounts listed in Attachment 2 of the September 29, 2021 Communication from the Mayor, attached to the Council File, and subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
       
    3. Negotiate and execute amendments to sub-recipient agreements with the following entities for contract amounts not to exceed the amounts listed in Attachment 2 of the September 29, 2021 Communication from the Mayor, attached to the Council File, and subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form:
      1. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department
         
      2. Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County
         
      3. Los Angeles County Department of Public Health
         
      4. Long Beach Police Department
         
      5. Orange County Sheriff's Department
         
      6. California Highway Patrol
         
      7. Riverside Police Department
         
      8. Riverside Fire Department
         
      9. Ontario Fire Department
    4. Release requests for proposals, evaluate proposals, and negotiate contracts for the purchase of approved equipment and training including consulting services as detailed in the FY21 STC grant budget.
       
    5. Receive, deposit into, and disburse from the FY20 STC grant fund.
       
  2. ADOPT the FY21 STC Sustainment grant budget; and, AUTHORIZE the Mayor to expend the grants in accordance with the approved budgets.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the Controller, or designee, to:
    1. Create new appropriations in Fund No. 64G/46, “FY20 STC” in the amount of $775,000.00 as follows:
       
      Fund/Dept. Account Title Amount
      64G/46 46V730 Equipment $27,500
      64G/46 46V668 Partner Jurisdiction 178,687.50
      64G/46 46V904 LAWA 26,250.00
      64G/46 46V942 POLA 28,500.00
      64G/46 46V138 Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) Salaries 26,250.00
      64G/46 46V170 Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Salaries 94,312.50
      64G/46 46V146 Mayor Salaries 248,429.00
      64G/46 46V299 Reimbursement of General Fund Costs 100,987.00
      64G/46 46V946 Management and Administration 44,084.00
          Total: $775,000.00

       
    2. Transfer appropriations from Fund No. 64G/46, FY20 STC, to the General Fund to reimburse STC-related expenditures as follows:
       
      Fund/Dept. Account Title Amount
      From:      
      64G/46 46V668 Mayor Salaries $248,429.00
      64G/46 46V138 LAFD Salaries 26,250.00
      64G/46 46V170 LAPD Salaries 94,312.50
          Total: $368,991.50
      To:      
      100/46 1020 Grant Reimbursed Salaries $248,429.00
      100/48 1098 Overtime Variable Staffing 26,250.00
      100/70 1092 Overtime Sworn 94,312.50
          Total: $368,991.50

       
    3. Transfer up to $100,987.00 from Fund No. 64G, Account No. 46V299 to the General Fund, Department No. 46, Revenue Source Code No. 5346, for reimbursement of grant-funded fringe benefits.
       
    4. Transfer cash from Fund No. 64G/46 to reimburse the General Fund, on an as-needed basis, upon presentation of proper documentation from City departments, subject to the approval of the Mayor’s Office of Public Safety.
       
  4. AUTHORIZE the Mayor, or designee, to prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, subject to approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 14, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, will provide the Mayor’s Office authority to accept the Fiscal Year 2021 Securing the Cities Sustainment Grant Program in the amount of $775,000. Grant funding will support costs to maintain the Los Angeles-Long Beach STC Program as follows: $27,500 for equipment maintenance; $31,000 for training center maintenance and radiation safety expenses; $354,000 to participating partner jurisdictions in the STC program; and $362,500 for grant management and administration. No matching funds are required.  There is no additional impact to the General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations contained in the October 14, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, are in compliance with the City's Financial Policies in that grant funds will be expended for grant-eligible activities and costs. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(5)
21-1047
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Alcohol Policing Partnership (APP) Program grant. 
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), or designee to:
     
    1. Retroactively apply for and accept the 2021-22 APP Program grant in the amount of $97,500 from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.
       
    2. Negotiate and execute the grant agreement for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.
       
  2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to:
     
    1. Submit grant reimbursement requests to the grantor and deposit grant receipts in the Police Department Grant Fund No. 339/70.
       
    2. Spend up to the grant amount of $97,500 in accordance with the grant award agreement.
       
    3. Prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), and authorize the Controller to implement the instructions.
       
  3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
    1. Establish a grant receivable and appropriate $97,500 to appropriation account number to be determined, within Fund No. 339/70, for the receipt and disbursement of the APP Program grant funds.
       
    2. Increase appropriations on an as-needed basis from the 2021-22 APP Program grant, Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, to Fund No. 100/70, account numbers and amounts as follows:

      Account No. 001012 Salaries Sworn $66,074

      Account No. 001092 Overtime Sworn $28,926
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 19, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, will allow for the expenditure of the 2021-22  APP Program grant award totaling $97,500. The grant will provide 45% of the salary of one Police Sergeant II position; overtime funding for sworn personnel; and equipment expenses. No matching funds are required for this grant.  The 55% salary cost that is not supported by the grant is provided within the Department’s 2021-22 Adopted Budget, as the grant is supplementing an existing Department function.  There is no additional impact to the General Fund as a result of these recommendations. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 19, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that one-time grant funding will be utilized for grant-eligible program expenditures. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(6)
21-1059
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) grant. 
   
 
Recommendations for Council action and SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), or designee, to:
     
    1. Retroactively apply for and accept the award for the FY 2021-22 STEP from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the amount of $5,076,000 for the period of October 1, 2021, through September 30, 2022.
       
    2. Execute the 2021-22 STEP grant agreement on behalf of the City and submit the necessary agreements and documents relative to the grant award, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
       
    3. Execute a professional services agreement with one selected vendor, for a term of twelve months within the applicable grant performance period, for a sum not to exceed $50,000, for the provision of phlebotomist services, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
       
  2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to:
     
    1. Spend up to the grant amount of $5,076,000 in accordance with the grant award agreement.
       
    2.  Submit grant reimbursement requests to the grantor and deposit grant receipts in the Police Department Grant Trust Fund No. 339/70.
       
    3. Prepare Controller’s instructions for any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, authorize the Controller to implement the instructions.
       
  3. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
     
    1. Establish a grant receivable and appropriate $5,076,000 to appropriation account, account number to be determined, within Fund No. 339/70, for the disbursement of the FY 2021-22 STEP grant funds.
       
    2. Increase appropriations on an as-needed basis from the FY 2021-22 STEP grant, account number to be determined, Fund No. 339/70, to Fund No. 100/70, account number and amounts as follows:
      1. Account No. 1092, Overtime Sworn, $4,000,000
         
      2. Account No. 1090, Overtime Civilian, $200,000
  4. AUTHORIZE and INSTRUCT the City Clerk to:
    1. Place the following action relative to the FY 2021-22 STEP Grant on the City Council Agenda on July 1, 2022, or on the first meeting day thereafter:
      ​​​​​​​
      1. Authorize the Controller to transfer from Fund No. 339/70, account number to be determined, to Fund No. 100/70, account number and amount as follows:
         
        1. Account No. 001092, Overtime Sworn, $555,800
           
        2. Account No. 001090, Overtime Civilian, $42,000
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 19, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, will allow for the expenditure of the FY 2021-22 STEP grant award totaling $5,076,000.  There is no impact to the General Fund as a result of these recommendations.  No matching funds are required for this grant. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that  the recommendations contained in the October 19, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that one-time grant funding will be utilized for one-time program expenditures. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(7)
18-1219
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a proposed contract amendment to Contract No. C-133903 with Justice and Security Strategies, Inc.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), or designee, to negotiate and execute a contract amendment with Justice and Security Strategies, Inc. (Contract No. C-133903) to increase its budget by $150,000 and expand its scope of work, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
     
  2. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement the instructions.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 21, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, will have no additional impact to the General Fund.  No matching funds are required for this grant. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations contained in the October 21, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that all grant funds will be utilized for grant-eligible activities. Community Impact Statement: None submitted 
 
 
(8)
20-1217-S1
EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the Red Cloud Wind Pseudo-Tie Agreement, the Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM), and Red Cloud LLC; and delegating to the Board of Water and Power Commissioners (Board) authority to amend the agreement.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND that the Pseudo-Tie Agreement is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2).  In accordance with this section, an activity is not subject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.  The approval of the Pseudo-Tie Agreement among LADWP, PNM, and Red Cloud Wind, LLC will not result in any physical change in the environment and, therefore, is not subject to CEQA.
     
  2. CONCUR with the Board’s September 30, 2021 action to approve Resolution 022-042, which approves the Red Cloud Wind Pseudo-Tie Agreement between the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), the PNM, and the Red Cloud Wind, LLC.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated October 13, 2021, approving the Red Cloud Wind Pseudo-Tie Agreement, LADWP Agreement No. BP21-003, by and among the City of Los Angeles, acting by and through the LADWP, the PNM, and Red Cloud LLC; and delegating to the Board authority to amend the agreement.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance authorizes approval of a Pseudo-Tie Agreement to facilitate receipt of the environmental attributes associated with the Red Wind Cloud Project. The proposed action is not applicable with the LADWP's Financial Policies submitted by the Board. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(9)
21-1112
EXEMPTION, ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to Resolution No. 22-043, which approves Open Access Transmission Tariff Form of Service Agreements for Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service with Powerex Corporation.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND that in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), it has been determined that the Agreements are exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2).  General Exemptions apply in situations where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment.  In accordance with this section, an activity is not subject to CEQA if it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.  Therefore, the execution of the Agreements are not subject to CEQA.
     
  2. CONCUR with the Board of Water and Power Commissioners’ September 28, 2021 action to approve Resolution 022-043, authorizing the execution of five Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service Agreements starting on January 1, 2022, to January 1, 2024, between the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP), and Powerex Energy Corporation.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated October 13, 2021, approving the Service Agreements for Firm Point-To-Point Transmission Service, LADWP Nos. BP20-025, BP20-026, BP20-027, BP20-028, and BP20-029, by and between the City of Los Angeles, acting by and through the LADWP, and Powerex Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, doing business in California as Powerex Energy Corporation.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer reports that there is no General Fund impact.  Approval of the proposed Resolution and Ordinance provides an estimated $38.4 million in revenue over two years to the LADWP Power Revenue Fund as a result of the Transmission Service Agreements. The proposed action complies with the LADWP Financial Policies. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(10)
08-3420-S4
ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 47071-2 between the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (LADWP) and Webcor/Obayashi/Lyles, a Joint Venture, for the Silver Lake Reservoir Complex Storage Replacement Project/Headworks Reservoir Project.
   
 
Recommendation for Council action:

CONCUR with the Board of Water and Power Commissioners' (Board) action of October 26, 2021, Resolution No. 022 060, approving and authorizing the LADWP to execute Amendment No. 5 to Agreement No. 47071-2 between the LADWP and Webcor/Obayashi/Lyles, a Joint Venture, for the Silver Lake Reservoir Complex Storage Replacement Project/Headworks Reservoir Project; and, authorizing and directing the Chief Accounting Employee, LADWP, upon proper certification, to direct and draw demands on the Water Revenue Fund in accordance with the terms of said Agreement.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Board. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - DECEMBER 27, 2021(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - DECEMBER 8, 2021)
 
(11)
21-0950
ENERGY, CLIMATE CHANGE, ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, AND RIVER COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the State funding to support City projects and work, involving climate change mitigation and resilience, conducted by the Bureau of Sanitation (BOS), Climate Emergency Mobilization Office, Office of the Petroleum Administrator, and Office of City Forest Management.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Koretz – Krekorian):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the Department of Public Works, City Administrative Officer (CAO), Bureau of Street Services, and other relevant City Departments and offices, to report on the availability of State funding to augment and support ongoing and future City projects and work involving climate change mitigation and resilience being conducted by the BOS, Climate Emergency Mobilization Office, Office of the Petroleum Administrator, and Office of City Forest Management.
     
  2. INSTRUCT the Department of City Planning (DCP) to report on the availability of State funding to augment and support the DCP projects involving climate change mitigation and habitat connectivity, including wildlife corridors.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes

For:
Westside Neighborhood Council
 
 
(12)
21-1079
CD 14
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES and HOUSING COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to a Request for Information (RFI) on Civic Center properties for at least 3.5 million square feet of housing and approximately 1.5 million square feet of City office space for municipal support.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (De Leon - Harris-Dawson):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department, in coordination with the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and Chief Legislative Analyst, (CLA) to issue an RFI on Civic Center properties with the intent to build at least 3.5 million square feet of housing and centralize / build approximately 1.5 million square feet of City office space for municipal support within the Civic Center, which should:
     
    1. Include the sites studied in the Civic Center Master Development Plan and others within the Downtown Los Angeles Civic Center, particularly the following properties: Los Angeles Mall, City Hall East, City Hall South, 911 Call Center, Parker Center lot, Personnel Building, and Medical Services Division/Testing and Training Center building.
       
    2. Be crafted with the intent to complete the projects in advance of the 2028 Olympics and to reduce the costs to the City as much as possible while maximizing the amount of affordable housing that can be constructed.
       
  2. INSTRUCT the aforementioned departments to report to Council with the results of the RFI.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(13)
21-1080
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to establishing a permanent Office of Procurement.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Raman – Krekorian – O’Farrell):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with the assistance of the Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) and relevant City staff and Departments, to provide a detailed report within 60 days on establishing a permanent Office of Procurement within the City Administrative Officer's office that would be responsible for the oversight, accountability, process, and protocols of the City's procurement operations with said report to include, but not be limited to:
     
    1. A complete description of the CPO's responsibilities, drawing on the experience of other major cities with successful centralized procurement offices or units, including but not limited to:
       
      1. Developing a comprehensive Procurement Policy Strategy, for approval by Council, with clear metrics, accountability mechanisms, and recommendations for reform and improvement, to be updated annually.
         
      2. Reporting to Council on a quarterly basis on ongoing contract activities and City-wide and department-level progress made toward achieving outcomes outlined in the Procurement Policy Strategy.
         
      3. Providing departments with oversight, support and expertise in drafting solicitations for bids, managing competitive bidding processes, negotiating and executing contracts.
         
      4. Identifying opportunities for executing City-wide professional service contracts based on an analysis of redundant service contracting across multiple departments, including proprietary departments.
         
      5. Creating a City-wide payment audit function to ensure timely payment to vendors.
         
      6. Developing a City-wide program to monitor subcontractor utilization.
         
      7. Leading the City's Business Certification Program, ensuring that program design is aligned with established policy priorities around equity and inclusion and that metrics are regularly established and reviewed by Council.
         
      8. Setting social and environmental standards for City contractors, for approval by Council, and ensuring these standards are in alignment with the City charter and ordinances in collaboration with the City Attorney.
         
      9. Working in concert with the Bureau of Contract Administration to ensure that contractors remain in compliance with the terms of their agreements with the City for the duration of those agreements.
         
      10. Managing the data and technology associated with procurement and developing a unified citywide system infrastructure.
         
      11. Managing relations with external stakeholders relevant to the City's procurement process.
         
    2. A full description of the governance mechanisms of the Office of Procurement, including but not limited to:
      1. Embedding review of procurement and contracting activities into annual Departmental budgeting process.
         
      2. Protocols for the Office of Procurement to review and prompt changes to Departmental procurement processes to conform with the City's Procurement Policy Strategy, as well as potential options to accelerate contracting processes for Departments who are engaged in best practices and meeting or exceeding policy objectives, such as relief from the strict mandates of Executive Directive.
         
      3. Proposed process for establishing Departmental Service Agreements with expectations, duties, and roles of procurement liaisons embedded in Departments.
        ​​​​​​​
    3. The costs, personnel, and facilities needs of a permanent Office of Procurement within the CAO to include an analysis of where personnel for the permanent Office of Procurement could be sourced from (within and outside current City staff) and benchmark comparisons with staffing and resources at other large municipalities' central procurement offices or units.
      ​​​​​​​
  2. REQUEST the City Attorney to report back within 60 days on any legal changes to the City's Ordinances and/or Charter that would be necessary to establish the Office of Procurement as the unit responsible for executing City-wide contracts with vendors on behalf of the City of Los Angeles.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(14)
21-0801
CD 11
ORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to a Zone Change for the property located at 1639 and 1641 South Abbot Kinney Boulevard.
   
  Fiscal Impact Statement: The WLAAPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Related California Environmental Quality Act Findings; Planning and Land Use Management Committee Report and Resolution adopted on November 12, 2021)
(15)
21-0984
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to improving access for the reporting of hate incidents and synthesizing/analyzing hate act data trends.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Cedillo - Price):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the Civil, Human Rights, and Equity Department and Information Technology Agency, with support from the Los Angeles Police Department, report within 60 days on the following:
     
    1. Improving access for the reporting of hate incidents through technological solutions such as the development of a dedicated mobile app and/or integration into the My311LA app.
       
    2. Enhancing the data captured through 311 to streamline the reporting of hate incidents and referral to relevant services.
       
    3. Integrating the various entry points and sources of data into one unified system.
       
    4. Creating a data analysis tool that can be accessed by the Civil, Human Rights, and Equity Department for regional hate-related data.
       
    5. Resources required to implement identified improvements.
       
  2. INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA) to report on State and Federal funding available for the City to synthesize and analyze hate act data trends and further implement resources to address these acts.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes

For: Westside Neighborhood Council
 
  (Immigrant Affairs, Civil Rights, and Equity Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(16)
21-0259
CD 10
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to declaring eight City-owned parcels located at 3782-3900 West Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard are exempt surplus land.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
  1. DECLARE, the eight City-owned parcels located at 3782 – 3900 West Martin Marlton Square, Luther King Jr. Boulevard, bearing Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 5032-004-910 through 5032-004-916 and 5032-005-902 are “exempt surplus land” for the purpose of the Surplus Land Act under Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(G), based on the valid legal restrictions imposed by US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), that the properties must be used for economic development purposes and cannot be used for the construction of new housing; and/or, under Government Code Section 54226 based on the conflict between the requirements of the HUD regulations and the Surplus Land Act.
     
  2. ADOPT, the accompanying Resolution declaring the eight parcels “exempt surplus land” for the purpose of the Surplus Land Act under Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(G), based on the valid legal restrictions imposed by HUD that the properties must be used for economic development purposes and cannot be used for the construction on new housing, and/or under Government Code Section 54226 based on the conflict between the requirements of the HUD regulations and the Surplus Land Act.
Fiscal Impact Statement:
The Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD) reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the October 8, 2021 EWDD report, attached to the Council FIle, will not have an impact on the General Fund.  The extent of any future impact on the General Fund is unknown at this time.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(17)
21-0730
CD 12
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to a request for authority to issue a tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for the Lumina Apartments, a 54-unit supportive housing project located at 10243 Topanga Canyon Boulevard.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. NOTE and FILE  the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), formerly Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department (HCIDLA), report dated September 27, 2021, relative to the issuance of tax-exempt conduit revenue bonds or notes for the Lumina Apartments project located at 10243 Topanga Canyon Boulevard.
     
  2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION attached to the subject City Administrative Officer (CAO) report, dated October 21, 2021, attached to the Council file, authorizing the issuance of up to $15,408,820 in tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for the Lumina Apartments project located at 10243 Topanga Canyon Boulevard.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute the relevant bond or note documents for the Lumina Apartments project, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there will be no impact to the General Fund as a result of the issuance of these multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes (bonds/notes) for the Lumina Apartments (Project). The City is a conduit issuer and does not incur liability for the repayment of the bonds/notes, which are a limited obligation payable solely from the revenues of the Project, and the City is not, under any circumstances, obligated to make payments on the bonds/notes. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations in the subject CAO report comply with the City’s Financial Policies. Debt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no debt impact as these bonds or notes are a conduit issuance debt and not a debt of the City. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(18)
21-0677
CD 15
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to a request for authority to issue tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for the Avalon 1355, a 53-unit supportive housing project, located at 1335-1359 North Avalon Boulevard.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. NOTE and FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), formerly Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department (HCIDLA), report dated October 4, 2021, relative to the issuance of tax-exempt conduit revenue bonds, or notes, for the Avalon 1355 project located at 1335-1359 North Avalon Boulevard.
     
  2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION attached to the subject City Administrative Officer (CAO) report, dated November 10, 2021, attached to the Council file, authorizing the issuance of up to $15,675,000 in tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds, or notes, for the Avalon 1355 project located at 1335-1359 North Avalon Boulevard.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute the relevant bond or note documents for the Avalon 1355 project, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there will be no impact to the General Fund as a result of the issuance of these multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes (bonds/notes) for the Avalon 1355 (Project). The City is a conduit issuer and does not incur liability for the repayment of the bonds/notes, which are a limited obligation payable solely from the revenues of the Project, and the City is not, under any circumstances, obligated to make payments on the bonds/notes. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations in the subject CAO report comply with the City Financial Policies. Debt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no debt impact as these bonds or notes are a conduit issuance debt and not a debt of the City. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(19)
21-1246
CD 11
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTIONS relative to a request for authority to adopt the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) Resolution and TEFRA minutes; and, issue tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for the Iris (formerly known as Barry Apartments) a 60-unit supportive housing project located at 2444 Barry Avenue.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. NOTE and FILE  the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), formerly Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department (HCIDLA), report dated October 28, 2021, relative to the issuance of tax-exempt conduit revenue bonds or notes for The Iris (formerly known as Barry Apartments) project located at 2444 Barry Avenue.
     
  2. CONSIDER the results of the TEFRA hearing held on July 22, 2021, for The Iris project attached to the subject City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated November 10, 2021, attached to the Council file.
     
  3. ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION attached to the subject CAO report, approving the issuance of up to $25,200,000 in tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for The Iris project located at 2444 Barry Avenue.
     
  4. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION attached to the subject CAO report, authorizing the issuance of up to $20,148,091 in tax-exempt multifamily conduit revenue bonds or notes for The Iris project located at 2444 Barry Avenue.
     
  5. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute the relevant bond or note documents for The Iris Project, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there will be no impact to the General Fund as a result of the issuance of these multifamily conduit revenue bonds, or notes (bonds/notes) for The Iris, formerly known as Barry Apartments (Project). The City is a conduit issuer and does not incur liability for the repayment of the bonds/notes, which are a limited obligation payable solely from the revenues of the Project. The City is not, under any circumstances, obligated to make payments on the bonds/notes. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations in the subject CAO report comply with the City Financial Policies. Debt Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no debt impact as these bonds or notes are a conduit issuance debt and not a debt of the City. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(20)
17-0090-S15
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a request for approval of an Amendment to the Proposition HHH (Prop HHH) Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-21 Project Expenditure Plan (PEP).
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) to issue letters of financial commitment not to exceed $15,555,556, per the breakdown provided in Table 1 of the LAHD report dated October 15, 2021, attached to the Council file, for two Prop HHH Housing Challenge projects:
     
    1. $7,000,000 for Avalon 1355.
       
    2. $8,555,556 for Beacon Landing (formerly known as Beacon PSH).
       
  2. APPROVE the FY 2020-2021 PEP to be amended and increased as follows (Attachment A of the LAHD report):
    ​​​​​​​
    1. $7,000,000 for Avalon 1355.
       
    2. $8,555,556 for Beacon Landing (formerly known as Beacon PSH).
       
    3. $5,460,000 for Lincoln Apartments.
       
    4. $9,600,000 for Rousseau (formerly known as Enlightenment Plaza - Phase I).
       
    5. $12,000,000 for Santa Monica & Vermont Apartments Phase I.
       
    6. $12,000,000 for Santa Monica & Vermont Apartments Phase IIl file.
       
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute loan documents, covenant/regulatory agreements, and any other documents necessary to implement the Prop HHH FY 2020-2021 PEP (Attachment A of the LAHD report) with each of the borrowers on projects selected for funding, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.
     
  4. AUTHORIZE the disbursement of Prop HHH funds to take place after the sponsors obtain enforceable commitments for all proposed funding, including, but not limited to, the full amount of funding and/or tax credits proposed.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Prop HHH AOC, the City Administrative Officer (CAO), and the LAHD.  The Chief Legislative Analyst has not completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(21)
14-0955-S6
PUBLIC SAFETY and PERSONNEL, AUDITS, AND ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEES’ REPORT relative to retroactive approval to apply for and accept a grant award for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Real Estate Fraud Prosecution (REFP) Program grant from the Los Angeles County REFP Trust Fund Committee for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. 
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 
  1. AUTHORIZE by resolution authority the following existing positions within the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) through June 30, 2022:

    No.       Class Code       Class Title
     2             2223-2          Detective II
     1             2223-3          Detective III
     
  2. AUTHORIZE by resolution authority the following new position within the LAPD through June 30, 2022:

    No.        Class Code        Class Title
      1             2223-2            Detective II
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the Chief, LAPD, or designee to:
     
    1. Retroactively apply for and accept the grant award for the FY 2021-22 REFP Program grant in the amount of $953,000 from the County of Los Angeles for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.
       
    2. Execute the 2021-22 REFP Program Grant Agreement with the County of Los Angeles, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form.

       
  4. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to:
     
    1. Spend up to the grant amount of $953,000 in accordance with the grant award agreement.
       
    2. Submit grant reimbursement requests to the grantor and deposit grant receipts in the Police Department Grant Trust Fund No. 339/70.
       
    3.  Prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments as necessary to implement Mayor and Council intentions, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer (CAO); and, authorize the Controller to implement the instructions.

       
  5. AUTHORIZE the Controller to:
     
    1. Establish a grant receivable and appropriate $953,000 to appropriation account, account number to be determined, within Fund No. 339/70, for the receipt and disbursement of the 2021-22 REFP Program grant funds.
       
    2. Transfer appropriations within Fund No. 339/70, as follows:

      From:

      Fund/Dept No.       Account No.       Account Name       Amount
      339/70                     70XXXX        To Be Determined    $305,724

      To:

      Fund/Dept No.      Account No.        Account Name       Amount
      339/70                     70XXXX            Related Costs      $305,724
       
    3. Increase appropriations on an as-needed basis from Fund No. 339/70, FY 2021-22 REFP Program grant appropriation, account number to be determined, to Fund No. 100/70, account numbers and amounts as follows:

      Account No. 001012       Sworn Salaries       $576,276
      Account No. 001092       Sworn Overtime      $60,000
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations contained in the August 16, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, will allow for the expenditure of the 2021-22 REFP Program grant award totaling $953,000. The grant will provide 100- percent of the salary costs of four resolution authority positions consisting of one Detective III position and three Detective II positions; 100 percent of the fringe benefit costs of one Detective III position, and one Detective II position; 77 percent of fringe benefit costs for one Detective II position; overtime funding for sworn personnel; and other expenses. The General Fund will fund the remaining indirect costs (fringe benefits, central services, and department administration and support). No matching funds are required for this grant. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations contained in the August 16, 2021 CAO report, attached to the Council File, are in compliance with the City's Financial Policies in that one-time grant funding will be utilized for grant-eligible program expenditures. Community Impact Statement: None submitted 
 
 

Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(22)
21-1300-S1
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (BUSCAINO – LEE) relative to a measure on the June 2022 Primary Nominating Election ballot that would amend the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit homeless encampments in all public areas, and related matters.
   
 
Recommendation for Council action:

REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents to place a measure on the June 2022 Primary Nominating Election ballot that would:
 
  1. Amend the Los Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit homeless encampments in all public areas, consistent with the Martin v. Boise decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, utilizing a progressive enforcement model, with all violations eligible for any applicable prosecution diversion program.
     
  2. Amend the Los Angeles Administrative Code, to ensure the City provides enough housing capacity in order to meet the requirements for enforcement under Martin v. Boise; and, designate the Office of Emergency Management as the lead department responsible for the production of and operation of emergency temporary housing.
     
  3. Amend the Los Angeles Administrative Code Division 8, Chapter 3 “Local Emergencies” to give the Mayor, during a declared state of emergency related to homelessness, authority to:
     
    1. Waive land-use code and zoning regulation requirements as necessary to urgently site homeless housing projects.
       
    2. Under-write or cover/fund waive all City project-related permitting fees for homeless housing projects.
       
    3. Process the application for project-related permits as first-in-line in order to expedite the permitting and inspection processes.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(23)
21-1308
MOTION (O’FARRELL – PRICE) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 13 recognition of Native American Two Spirits on November 16, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 13 recognition of Native American Two Spirits on November 16, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
 
 
(24)
21-1309
MOTION (O’FARRELL – KREKORIAN) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 13 special recognition of Native American Ancestors on November 23, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 13 special recognition of Native American Ancestors on November 23, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
 
 
(25)
21-1307
MOTION (O’FARRELL – MARTINEZ) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 13 and the Transgender Advisory Council in observance of Transgender Day of Remembrance on November 21, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100-/0, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for Services in connection with the Council District 13 and the Transgender Advisory Council in observance of Transgender Day of Remembrance at City Hall  on November 21, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
 
 
(26)
21-1312
MOTION (O’FARRELL – KREKORIAN) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 13 recognition of Every Child Matters Movement on November 12, 2021 including the illumination of City Hall.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER and APPROPRIATED $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/86 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 13 recognition of Every Child Matters Movement on November 14, 2021 including the illumination of City Hall.
 
 
(27)
21-1310
MOTION (O’FARRELL – PRICE) relative to funding for services in connection with the Council District 13 in observance of World AIDS Day at City Hall on December 1, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $400 from the Council’s portion of the Heritage Month Celebration and Special Events-Council line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 13 in observance of World AIDS Day at City Hall on December 1, 2021,  including the illumination of City Hall.
 
 
(28)
21-1311
MOTION (KREKORIAN – O’FARRELL) relative to funding for services in connection with Council District 2 special commemoration on November 9, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall, commemorating the passage of one year since the official end of hostilities after brutal aggression by Azerbaijan against the Republic of Artsakh.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

TRANSFER $400 in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 0702 (CD 2 Community Services) to the General Services Fund No. 100/40, Account No. 1070 (Salaries-As-Needed), for services in connection with the Council District 2 special commemoration on November 9, 2021, including the illumination of City Hall, commemorating the passage of one year since the official end of hostilities after brutal aggression by Azerbaijan against the Republic of Artsakh, in memory of those who were killed, and in solidarity with the Armenian prisoners of war still being held captive illegally by Azerbaijan.
 
 
(29)
21-1341
CD 5
MOTION (KORETZ – BLUMENFIELD) relative to funding for non-reimbursabe overtime activities in the Wilshire Division of Council District Five.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $20,000 from the Council District 5 portion of the “Neighborhood Service Enhancements” line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to the Police Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 1092 (Overtime – Police Officers) for non-reimbursable overtime activities in the Wilshire Division of Council District Five.
  2. AUTHORIZE the Police Department to make any technical corrections or clarification as necessary to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
 
 
(30)
21-1339
CD 5
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KORETZ – BLUMENFIELD) relative to asserting jurisdiction over the October 20, 2021 West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (WLAAPC) action on an appeal that the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) erred or abused its discretion in issuing building permits, for the property located at 627 North Carcassonne Road.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. ASSERT jurisdiction, pursuant to Los Angeles City Charter Section 245, over the October 20, 2021 (Letter of Determination dated November 9, 2021) WLAAPC action to deny an appeal that the LADBS erred or abused its discretion in the issuance of building permits; and sustained the Director of Planning determination dated April 23, 2021, for the construction of a new single-family dwelling with attached garage, pool/spa, site retaining wall and associated site grading, for the property located at 627 North Carcassonne Road, Los Angeles, CA 90077.
     
  2. REFER this matter, upon assertion of jurisdiction, to the Planning and Land Use Management Committee for review and consideration.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - NOVEMBER 30, 2021(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - NOVEMBER 30, 2021)
 
10 VOTES REQUIRED
(31)
21-1338
CD 5
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (KORETZ – BLUMENFIELD) relative to asserting jurisdiction over the October 20, 2021 West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (WLAAPC) action on an appeal that the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) erred or abused its discretion in issuing building permits, for the property located at 10701 West Bellagio Road.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. ASSERT jurisdiction, pursuant to Los Angeles City Charter Section 245, over the October 20, 2021 (Letter of Determination dated November 9, 2021) WLAAPC action to deny an appeal that the LADBS erred or abused its discretion in the issuance of building permits; and, sustained the Director of Planning’s determination, dated April 23, 2021, for the construction of a new single-family dwelling with attached garage, pool/spa, site retaining wall and associated site grading, for the property located at 10701 West Bellagio Road, Los Angeles, CA 90077.
     
  2. ASSERT jurisdiction of this matter, to be referred to the Planning and Land Use Management Committee for further review.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - NOVEMBER 30, 2021(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - NOVEMBER 30, 2021)
 
10 VOTES REQUIRED
(32)
21-1315
CD 13
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2017-2202 located at 813 North Robinson Street, northerly of Marathon Street.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2017-2202, located at 813 North Robinson Street, northerly of Marathon Street and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents.

(Bond No. C-139410)
Owner: Robinson Street Ventures, LLC;  Surveyor: Taik Yul Kim
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B) (3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(33)
21-1316
CD 13
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Tract No. 2018-7129 located at 2309 and 2311 West Cove Avenue, westerly of Apex Avenue.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 2018-7129, located at 2309 and 2311 West Cove Avenue, westerly of Apex Avenue and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents.

(Bond No. C-139411)
Owner: Adaptive Capital Corporation, LLC; Surveyor: Mahmoud Khalili Samani
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B) (3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(34)
21-1298
CD 1
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (CEDILLO – DE LEON) relative to funding and actions needed to repair / modernize the elevators at Cathay Manor located at 600 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) to transfer/appropriate Foreclosure Registry Penalty Fees, within the Foreclosure Registry Fund No. F56V/43, Appropriation Account No. 43V559 - Urgent Repair Program, amounting to $1 million, to contract on an emergency basis with a qualified elevator repair company to immediately restore elevator service on a temporary basis with the approval and cooperation of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety, and to the extent feasible repair the elevator(s).
     
  2. REIMBURSE the costs to the Foreclosure Registry Fund upon repayment by the owner of direct costs, permit fees, interest, and related costs, plus 40 percent of the cost to perform the actual work to cover the City’s costs for administering any contract and supervising the work required, as provided in Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 7.35.3.(c) and under Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 50.00.C.5, and/or through execution of a lien on the property as provided in Administrative Code Section 7.35,3. et seq.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the Director of Accounting, LAHD, to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above instructions to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Housing Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(35)
09-0005-S606
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 417 East 65th Street (Case No. 668855) Assessor I.D. No. 6006-018-036 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 417 East 65th Street (Case No. 668855) Assessor I.D. No. 6006-018-036 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(36)
21-0005-S162
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 4735 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Case No. 573010) Assessor I.D. No. 2264-001-043 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 4735 North Sepulveda Boulevard (Case No. 573010) Assessor I.D. No. 2264-001-043 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(37)
21-0005-S163
CD 10
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 3950 West 6th Street (Case No. 579211) Assessor I.D. No. 5503-031-007 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 3950 West 6th Street (Case No. 579211) Assessor I.D. No. 5503-031-007 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(38)
21-0005-S164
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 122 South Hayworth Avenue (Case No. 731589) Assessor I.D. No. 5511-025-025 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 122 South Hayworth Avenue (Case No. 731589) Assessor I.D. No. 5511-025-025 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(39)
21-0005-S165
CD 9
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1138 West 52nd Street (Case No. 680837) Assessor I.D. No. 5002-028-025 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1138 West 52nd Street (Case No. 680837) Assessor I.D. No. 5002-028-025 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(40)
21-0005-S166
CD 15
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1447 North Marine Avenue (Case No. 697511) Assessor I.D. No. 7421-023-029 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1447 North Marine Avenue (Case No. 697511) Assessor I.D. No. 7421-023-029 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(41)
21-0005-S167
CD 14
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 3501 North Locke Avenue (Case No. 672562) Assessor I.D. No. 5213-003-003 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 3501 North Locke Avenue (Case No. 672562) Assessor I.D. No. 5213-003-003 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(42)
21-0005-S168
CD 10
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 3517 West Mont Clair Street (Case No. 708302) Assessor I.D. No. 5051-017-007 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated November 15, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 3517 West Mont Clair Street (Case No. 708302) Assessor I.D. No. 5051-017-007 from the REAP.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(43)
21-1351
CD 11
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Tract No. 74274, located at 1735 South Westgate Avenue, northwesterly of Nebraska Avenue.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the final map of Tract No. 74274, located at 1735 South Westgate Avenue, northwesterly of Nebraska Avenue and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents.

(Bond No. C-139466)
Owner: 1735 South Westgate LLC; Surveyor: Cesar S. Bregaudit
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final tract map pursuant to Section 19.02(A) (2) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(44)
21-1353
CD 7
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2007-4471, located at 9705 La Canada Way, easterly of Mary Bell Avenue.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2007-4471, located at 9705 La Canada Way, easterly of Mary Bell Avenue and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents.

(Bond No. C-139467)
Owner: Imad Aboul-Hosn ; Surveyor: Nick Kazemi
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B) (3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(45)
21-0008-S7
CD 12
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along Plummer and Prairie Streets in Council District 12.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the following street segments:
     
    1. Both sides of Plummer Street from Geyser Avenue to Wilbur Avenue
       
    2. Both sides of Prairie Street from Geyser Avenue to Wilbur Avenue
  2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No. 1.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(46)
21-0008-S8
CD 12
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along Rinaldi and Chatsworth Streets in Council District 12.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the following street segments:
     
    1. Both sides of Rinaldi Street from Balboa Blvd to Woodley Avenue
       
    2.  Both sides of Chatsworth Street from Wilbur Ave to Yolanda Avenue
       
  2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No. 1.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(47)
21-0008-S10
CD 6
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (MARTINEZ – PRICE) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along Wentworth Street from Woodale Avenue to Roslyndale Avenue.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along both sides of Wentworth Street from Woodale Avenue to Roslyndale Avenue.
     
  2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No. 1.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(48)
21-0008-S11
CD 12
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along segments of Plummer Street, Valley Circle Boulevard, and Chatsworth Street.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the following street segments:
     
    1. Both sides of Plummer Street from Geyser Avenue to Yolanda Avenue.
       
    2. The east side of Valley Circle Boulevard from Schoenborn Street to 400 feet north of the intersection.
       
    3. Both sides of Chatsworth Street from Tampa Avenue to Wilbur Avenue.
       
  2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No. 1.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(49)
21-0008-S12
CD 12
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to establishing oversize vehicle parking restrictions along segments of Lassen Street, Eddelston Drive and Etiwanda Avenue.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution:
 
  1. RESOLVE, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4 and California Vehicle Code Section 22507, to hereby prohibit the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over seven feet in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am, along the following street segments:
     
    1. Both sides of Lassen Street from Farralone Ave to Shoup Avenue
       
    2. Both sides of Eddelston Drive from dead end (east of Reseda) west to Reseda Boulevard
       
    3. Both sides of Etiwanda Avenue from Donmetz Street to Index Street
       
  2. DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon approval of this action, to post signs giving notice of a “Tow Away, No Parking” restriction for oversize vehicles within the specific hours detailed at the location detailed above in Recommendation No. 1.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)

Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).