Meeting
  City Logo

AGENDA

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL

 

 
    Tuesday, August 30, 2022

10:00 AM


JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

ROOM 340, CITY HALL

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com
 
President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
  BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
  NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT VACANT, Tenth District
  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
  KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
  JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
 
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings
 
The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621-CITY (Metro), (818) 904-9450 (Valley), (310) 471-CITY (Westside), and (310) 547-CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.
 
Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in-person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in-person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid-19 vaccination or of a negative Covid-19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid-19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.
 
Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.
 
Telecommunication Relay Services
 
Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications.
 
Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.
 
What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
 
Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.
 
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.
 
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 
BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
 
AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.
 
The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.
 
PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.
 
The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.
 
If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.
 
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
 
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
 
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
 
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or [email protected].
 
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
 
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
 
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
 
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
 
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
 
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
 
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
 
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
 
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
 
RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
 

Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items Noticed for Public Hearing

(1)
22-0900-S29
CD 13
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Franklin and Cherokee Avenues Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(2)
22-0900-S30
CD 14
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Hill and 9th Streets Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(3)
22-0900-S31
CD 3
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Avenue San Luis and Shoup Avenue Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(4)
22-0900-S32
CD 4
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Ambrose Avenue and Rodney Drive No. 1 Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(5)
22-0900-S33
CD 11
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Corinth Avenue and Tennessee Avenue No. 1 Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(6)
22-0900-S34
CD 2
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Hatteras Street and Camellia Avenue No. 1 Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(7)
22-0900-S35
CD 7
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Foothill Boulevard and Esko Avenue Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(8)
22-0900-S36
CD 7
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Glenoaks Boulevard and Filmore Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(9)
22-0900-S37
CD 12
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Canby Avenue and Gresham Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(10)
22-0900-S38
CD 13
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Maubert and Vermont Avenues Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. DENY the protest and confirm the assessments.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE levying the assessments and ordering the maintenance of the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).

   
(11)
22-0900-S39
CD 3
CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING PROTESTS and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the improvement and maintenance of the Tarzana Drive and Mecca Avenue Street Lighting District.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

  1. FIND that a majority protest exists in the Street Lighting Maintenance Assessment District and therefore the assessment cannot be enacted.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE abandoning all proceedings relating to the above lighting district, in accordance with Sections 6.95-6.127 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code and Government Code Section 53753 (Proposition 218).
     
  3. INSTRUCT the Director, Bureau of Street Lighting, to ensure that the streetlights are not installed or are removed from service if previously installed.

   
(12)
22-0842
CD 14
HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for both on-site and off-site consumption at Chapman Market, located at 221 West 8th Street.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:

  1. DETERMINE that the issuance of a liquor license at Chapman Market, located at 221 West 8th Street, will serve the Public Convenience or Necessity and will not tend to create a law enforcement problem.
     
  2. GRANT the Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for  both on-site and off-site consumption at Chapman Market, located at 221 West 8th Street.
     
  3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit this determination to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control as required findings under Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4.
 

Applicant: David Dabbour

Representative: Maria Impala - Art Rodriguez Associates

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - OCTOBER 18, 2022

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - OCTOBER 18, 2022)

   
(13)
22-0844
CD 5
HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption at Whole Foods Market, located at 1050 South Gayley Avenue.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:

  1. DETERMINE that the issuance of a liquor license at Whole Foods Market, located at 1050 South Gayley Avenue, will serve the Public Convenience or Necessity and will not tend to create a law enforcement problem.
     
  2. GRANT the Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for  off-site consumption at Whole Foods Market, located at 1050 South Gayley Avenue.
     
  3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit this determination to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control as required findings under Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4.
 

Applicant: Mrs. Goochs Natural Food Market, Inc c/o Ryan Bissett

Representative: Stephen Jamieson

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - OCTOBER 20, 2022

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - OCTOBER 19, 2022)

   
(14)
22-0050
CD 14
EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the name of Bailey Street from 1st Street to Pennsylvania Avenue being changed and established as Vicente Fernandez Street.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 

  1. FIND that the name change and establishment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5 of the City’s Environmental Guidelines.
     
  2. FIND that the name of Bailey Street from 1st Street to Pennsylvania Avenue, shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated August 18, 2022, attached to the Council file, be changed and established as Vicente Fernandez Street.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated August 18, 2022, effectuating such change and establishment, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney.
     
  4. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit:
     
    1. A copy of Ordinance upon publication to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles pursuant to Section 34092 of the Government Code.
       
    2. A copy of the Council’s action on this matter to the Los Angeles Department of Transportation, City-wide Investigation Section, 100 South Main Street.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the Bureau of Engineering is absorbing the cost of processing the request in the approximate amount of $5,000.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

(Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(16)
15-0104-S8
CD 12
ENVIRONMENTAL IMACT REPORT (EIR) and RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS; and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Third Amendment to the 2008 Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the City and the Porter Ranch Development Company to extend the term, for real property in the Chatsworth-Porter Ranch Community Plan area covered by the Porter Ranch Specific Plan.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
  1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision-maker, after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the project was assessed in EIR No. 1988-0026(SP)(ZC)(PA) [State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 88050420], certified on July 10, 1990, as modified by Addenda dated July 2000, September 2000, October 2006, and April 2016; and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164, no subsequent EIR, negative declaration, or addendum is required for approval of the project.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance authorizing the execution of a Third Amendment to the certain 2008 Amended and Restated Development Agreement by and between the City and Porter Ranch Development Company, to extend the term of the Development Agreement to December 31, 2026, relating to real property in the Chatsworth-Porter Ranch Community Plan area within the area covered by the Porter Ranch Specific Plan, adopted by Ordinance No. 166,068, as amended, and 167,523; as well as per Amendments as approved by Ordinance Nos. 171,568, 173,873, 180,084, 183,579, and 185,253.

Applicant: Porter Ranch Development Company

Representative: Nicholas Norvillas

Case No. CPC-1990-439-DA-M3

Environmental No. EIR No. 1988-0026(SP)(ZC)(PA) (SCH No. 88050420)

Related Cases: CPC-1990-439-DA-M2; CPC-1990-439-DA-M1; CPC-1990-439-DA

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   

Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(17)
22-0944
CD 8
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON – BLUMENFIELD) relative to temporarily closing the alley adjacent to 9617 South Hobart Boulevard east of Western Avenue between West 96th Street and West 98th Street.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

INSTRUCT the City Engineer to report with recommendations to temporarily close the alley adjacent to 9617 South Hobart Boulevard east of Western Avenue between West 96th Street and West 98th Street, pursuant to State Vehicle Code Section 21101.4.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

(Public Works Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   
(18)
22-0972
CD 4
MOTION (RAMAN - LEE) relative to coordinating a street banner program to promote the Griffith Observatory and the Griffith Observatory Foundation’s “Samuel Oschin Planetarium in a Decade” show in Council District 4.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:

  1. APPROVE in accordance with the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 62.132, the Street Banner Program being coordinated by the Griffith Observatory and the Griffith Observatory Foundation, as a City of Los Angeles Non-event Street Banner Program for the period of September 2022-September 2023.

     
  2. APPROVE the content of the street banner designs, attached to the Motion.

   
(19)
22-0973
CD 4
MOTION (RAMAN - KREKORIAN) relative to coordinating street banners to promote the Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council and encourage stakeholders to become involved with the community and City government.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:

  1. APPROVE, in accordance with Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 62.132, the Street Banner program being coordinated by the Sherman Oaks Neighborhood Council, as a City of Los Angeles Non-Event Street Banner Program for the period of October 14, 2022 - October 14, 2023.

     
  2. APPROVE the content of the street banner designs, attached to the Motion.

   
(20)
14-0005-S4
CD 8
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1361 West 35th Street (Case No. 632719) Assessor I.D. No. 5040-003-007 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1361 West 35th Street (Case No. 632719) Assessor I.D. No. 5040-003-007 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(21)
14-0005-S146
10
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 2531 South Hillcrest Drive (Case No. 734214) Assessor I.D. No. 5057-005-017 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 2531 South Hillcrest Drive (Case No. 734214) Assessor I.D. No. 5057-005-017 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(22)
22-0005-S135
CD 15
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 851 East 112th Street (Case No. 734968) Assessor I.D. No. 6072-017-026 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 851 East 112th Street (Case No. 734968) Assessor I.D. No. 6072-017-026 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(23)
22-0005-S136
CD 13
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 1222 North Kenmore Avenue (Case No. 777445) Assessor I.D. No. 5540-011-002 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 1222 North Kenmore Avenue (Case No. 777445) Assessor I.D. No. 5540-011-002 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(24)
22-0005-S138
CD 1
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 2503 North Griffin Avenue (Case No. 742135) Assessor I.D. No. 5204-022-015 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 2503 North Griffin Avenue (Case No. 742135) Assessor I.D. No. 5204-022-015 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(25)
22-0005-S140
CD 9
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING DEPARTMENT (LAHD) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 202 East 47th Street (Case No. 723719) Assessor I.D. No. 5109-010-054 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the LAHD report recommendation dated August 23, 2022, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 202 East 47th Street (Case No. 723719) Assessor I.D. No. 5109-010-054 from the REAP.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the LAHD. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(26)
22-0976
CD 2
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER relative to the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018-6920 located at 5409 North Morella Avenue, northerly of Chandler Boulevard.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the final map of Parcel Map L.A. No. 2018-6920, located at 5409 North Morella Avenue, northerly of Chandler Boulevard and accompanying Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Contract with security documents.

(Bond No. C-141200)
Owner: La La Land Investment, LLC; Surveyor: Mohamad Molai

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the subdivider has paid a fee of $9,064 for the processing of this final parcel map pursuant to Section 19.02(B) (3) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code. No additional City funds are needed.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(27)
22-0933
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (CAO) relative to proposed Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the City of Beverly Hills for animal care and control services.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the Department of Animal Services (DAS) to execute a MOA with the City of Beverly Hills to provide animal care and control services for a term of five years commencing January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2026, with future service rate adjustments in amounts necessary to maintain full cost recovery to the DAS. 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no General Fund impact as the City of Beverly Hills will fully reimburse the City for the cost of services provided by the DAS.  Also, any increase in costs realized through the provision of services to the City of Beverly Hills over the five-year term will result in an adjustment in the amounts necessary, in order to maintain full cost recovery to the DAS for the services provided.  

   
 

Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation stated in the August 4, 2022 CAO report are compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that ongoing revenues will support ongoing expenditures. 

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

(Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   
(28)
22-0955
COMMUNICATION FROM THE ECONOMIC AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (EWDD) relative to the exemption of five grant-funded positions from the Civil Service pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4). 
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the exemption of the following grant-positions for the EWDD pursuant to Charter Section 1001(d)(4):
 

Position ID Class Code Title Division Council File No.
2468 1538 Senior Project Coordinator Workforce Development 22-0014
2472 1537 Project Coordinator Workforce Development 22-0014
2470 1538 Senior Project Coordinator Workforce Development 22-0014
2471 1537 Project Coordinator Workforce Development 22-0014
2473 1546 Senior Project Assistant Workforce Development 22-0014
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the EWDD.  Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financnial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

(Personnel, Audits, and Animal Welfare Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   
(29)
22-0981
CD 10
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (MARTINEZ - CEDILLO - KORETZ - DE LEON - O'FARRELL) relative to the appointment of Heather Hutt to hold the office of Council District 10.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

APPOINT Heather Hutt to hold the office of Council District 10 until Mr. Ridley-Thomas is acquitted or the charges against him are dismissed, whichever comes first.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

(Rules, Elections and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   

Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Closed Session

(30)
22-0724
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Sonia Holguin v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC685997. (This matter arises from allegations the City violated the Fair Employment and Housing Act statutes involving an employee at the Finance department.)

(Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   
(31)
22-0720
CD 8
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled ABY Holdings, LLC, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 20STCP03572.

(Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   
(32)
22-0546
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Salvador Duenas v. City of Los Angeles, et al., United States District Case No. CV18-08079-CJC (ADSx). (This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on November 19, 2017, in Pacoima, California.)

(Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   
(33)
22-0409
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled City of Los Angeles v. Lance Jay Robbins Paloma Partnership, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV18917. (This legal action arises from a suit to collect transient occupancy taxes.)

(Budget and Finance Committee considered this matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   
(34)
22-0819
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Randall Stewart v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 21STCV10900. (This matter arises from an incident involving members of the Los Angeles Police Department on May 30, 2020 in Los Angeles, California.)

(Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   
(35)
22-0725
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled Minoosh Maalizadeh v. City of Los Angeles, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV34474. (This matter arises from a trip and fall that occurred on August 11, 2018 near 16661 Ventura Boulevard.)

(Budget and Finance Committee considered the above matter in Closed Session on August 22, 2022)
   

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).