Meeting
Please Note That This Agenda Includes a Call­-in Option for Public Comment. Public Comment Will Thus Be Taken Both In­-Person in the Council Chamber And Also via Teleconference. Instructions for the Public to Listen to and Offer Remote Public Comment at the Meeting Appear on Page 2 of this Agenda.
       
  City Logo

AGENDA

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL

 

 
    Wednesday, May 10, 2023

10:00 AM

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER
ROOM 340, CITY HALL
200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com
 
President EUNISSES HERNANDEZ, First District
PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
  NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore KATY YAROSLAVSKY, Fifth District
CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District VACANT, Sixth District
  MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore HEATHER HUTT, Tenth District
VACANT TRACI PARK, Eleventh District
  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
  HUGO SOTO-MARTÍNEZ, Thirteenth District
  KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
  TIM MCOSKER, Fifteenth District
 
PUBLIC COMMENT AND LIVE BROADCAST
 
The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.gov/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621-CITY (Metro), (818) 904-9450 (Valley), (310) 471-CITY (Westside), and (310) 547-CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.
 
The City Council will take public comment from members of the public in the Council chamber and also by teleconference. Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council via teleconference should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting, press *9 to request to speak.
 
Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.
 
Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.
 
Telecommunication Relay Services
 
Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications. Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.
 
What forms of TRS are available? There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
 
Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.
 
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.
 
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
 
BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
 
AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.gov or lacouncilcalendar.com.
 
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.
 
The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.
 
PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.
 
The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.
 
If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.
 
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
 
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
 
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
 
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or [email protected].
 
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
 
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
 
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
 
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
 
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
 
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
 
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
 
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
 
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
 
RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
 

Los Angeles City Council Agenda

Wednesday, May 10, 2023

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1)
22-0323
CD 3
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to approving the establishment of a street in Reseda Park, and related matters.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. DETERMINE that the City’s action approving the establishment of a street in Reseda Park is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article III, Section 1, Class 1(3) [Minor alterations of highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities] and Class 1(14) [Issuance of a license or permit to use an existing property involving negligible or no expansion of use] of City CEQA Guidelines and Article 19, Section 15301 of California CEQA Guidelines.
     
  2. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated January 31, 2023, approving the establishment of a street in Reseda Park.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(2)
23-0350
NEIGHBORHOODS AND COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the curriculum-based self defense programing by geographical area that have been or are currently being offered by the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) and other departments, and possible expansion of the programming for women of all ages.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez - Hernandez):
 
  1. REQUEST the RAP, with the assistance of the Youth Development Department and the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), report on curriculum-based self defense programing by geographical area that have been or are currently being offered by the RAP, and other departments, and possible expansion of the programming for Women of all ages.
     
  2. REQUEST the RAP, with the assistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), to report possible curriculum-based self defense programming for Women of all ages if none currently exist. The report should include budget requirements, and be prioritized by geographic locations.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(3)
22-1465
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to evaluating all existing peak-hour travel lanes.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. APPROVE the Los Angeles Department of Transportation’s (LADOT) proposed work plan, as detailed in the March 10, 2023 LADOT report, attached to the Council File, to identify existing peak-hour lanes Citywide and determine their future use.
     
  2. DIRECT the LADOT to report in 90 days with findings and recommendations to retain, convert, or eliminate peak-hour travel lanes.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that there is no impact to the General Fund as a result of the recommended action.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: Yes

For:
Downtown Los Angeles Neighborhood Council 

Against:
Studio City Neighborhood Council 

   
(4)
19-0453-S2
CD 11
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the status of the Lincoln Boulevard (SR-1) Multimodal Bridge Improvement Project.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action:

NOTE and FILE the April 5, 2023 Los Angeles Department of Transportation report, inasmuch as this report is for information only and no Council action is required..

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(5)
23-0306
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the feasibility of establishing a dedicated speed hump program for schools.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Krekorian – Hutt – Hernandez):

INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to report on the feasibility of establishing a dedicated speed hump program for all schools, including the required funding and staffing resources, and a timeline for execution. 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: Yes

For:
Westside Neighborhood Council

   
(6)
20-0976-S1
CD 12
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to installing permanent ceremonial signage for Historical-Cultural Monument No. 1235 (March Avenue Palm Trees).
   
 

Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Lee – Blumenfield):

DIRECT the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to erect permanent ceremonial sign(s) at the following Historic-Cultural Monument located in Council District 12:

March Avenue Palm Trees: Historical-Cultural Monument No. 1235 located in the Public Right-of-Way in the median and along the east side of North March Avenue between West Ingomar Street and West Justice Street. 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(7)
15-0315-S8
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT and RESOLUTION relative to requesting authority to submit a project application for the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022-23 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP). 
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. ADOPT the accompanying LCTOP Project Resolution, as required by Caltrans, attached to the April 12, 2023 Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) report in the Council file. 
     
  2. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LADOT, to apply for, accept funds, and execute any necessary agreements for FY 2022-23 LCTOP grant funds from Caltrans in an amount up to $1,668,293 for costs associated with the implementation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and equipment at the Commercial Street Bus Operations and Maintenance Facility, located at 454 East Commercial Street, Los Angeles, California 90012.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the funds to be deposited in Fund No. 385, account number to be determined, entitled “LCTOP Facility Upgrades for Electrification” and appropriate therein for the implementation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure and equipment. 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that there is no impact to the City’s General Fund since there is no match for this project.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(8)
23-0388
TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT relative to proposed first amendments to contracts for 97 firms on the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) list of on-call professional consultants services.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LADOT, or designee, to execute an 11-month extension, expiring on January 26, 2024, with each of the 97 firms on the LADOT on-call professional consultant services list as detailed in the April 4, 2023 LADOT report, attached to the Council File, contingent on each firm submitting all required contractor compliance documents prior to execution of initial contract and subsequent Task Order Agreements and forward these contract extensions to the Council for consideration.
     
  2. INSTRUCT the LADOT to:
     
    1. Report three times per year to the Mayor, the City Administrative Officer, the Chief Legislative Analyst, and the Transportation Committee regarding all executed Task orders using this on-call list in order to promote transparency.
       
    2. Report to the Transportation Committee on June 14, 2023 with a Draft Request For Qualifications (RFQ) for on-call professional consultant services for the LADOT, which shall include the utilization of the on-call professional services and identify the services currently contracted that could be provided by LADOT employees or by City employees in other Departments.
       
    3. Return to the Transportation committee to transmit the new RFQ list to Council no later than October 15, 2023.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that there is no impact on the General Fund.  The LADOT’s use of the proposed on-call professional consultant services list depends on securing funds through the Department’s budget, project budget, special purpose fund appropriations, grants, or other budget actions for the requested consultant services.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
(9)
23-0361
CD 10
EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15096, PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR), CASE NO. ENV-2021-9507-EIR, STATE CLEARINGHOUSE (SCH) NO. 2021110079, MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, and RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS; and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amendments to the West Adams – Baldwin Hills  – Leimert Community Plan Implementation Overlay (CPIO) and the Exposition Corridor Transit Neighborhood Plan (TNP).
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 

  1. FIND and DETERMINE, pursuant to CEQA Section 15096(e) and (f), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, that the Project was adequately assessed in the previously certified EIR, Case No. ENV-2021-9507-EIR (SCH No. 2021110079), for the Project, certified by the City of Culver City on December 5, 2022; ADOPT, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15096(g), the Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring Program, dated October 2022; ADOPT, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, the related and prepared environmental findings required by the CEQA Guidelines; and, ADOPT, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15096(h) and 15093, the Statement of Overriding Considerations required by the CEQA Guidelines.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), dated March 24, 2023 in the Council file, and the SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP), attached to the DCP report dated April 28, 2023 in the Council file, as the Findings of Council.
    .
  3. ADOPT an amendment to the West Adams – Baldwin Hills – Leimert CPIO to modify the development regulations for Parcel Group A within the Venice/National Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) subarea, pursuant to Section 11.5.7 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC); and, ADOPT an amendment to the Exposition Corridor TNP to remove the Project Site from the plan area boundaries, pursuant to LAMC Section 11.5.7; for the development of an integrated creative office complex on 4.46 acres located within the City of Los Angeles and the City of Culver City. On the Los Angeles portion (Los Angeles Parcel, or Project Site), the Project proposes construction of a new 334,517 square-foot office building. The building would be five stories, measuring 71 feet in height to the top of the roof, with a three-level subterranean garage. Existing on­-site improvements, including 86,226 square feet of office and retail uses on the Los Angeles Parcel, would be demolished to allow for construction of the Project, for the properties located at 8876 - 8888 West Venice Boulevard and 8829 West National Boulevard, subject to Conditions of Approval.
     
  4. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present Ordinances to:
     
    1. Amend the West Adams – Baldwin Hills – Leimert CPIO to modify the development regulations for Parcel Group A within the Venice/National TOD subarea.
       
    2. Amend the Exposition Corridor TNP to remove the Project Site from the plan area boundaries, for the development of an office complex, as recommended in the March 24, 2023 LACPC report, subject to Conditions of Approval and the Findings as amended by the PLUM Committee on May 2, 2023, attached to the Council file.

Applicant: Melissa Schild, Culver Crossings Properties LLC

Representative: Matt Dzurec, Armbruster Goldsmith & Delvac LLP

Case No. CPC-2021-9506-CPIO-SP-SPR-WDI

Environmental No. ENV-2021-9507-EIR (SCH No. 2021110079)
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - JUNE 5, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JUNE 2, 2023)

   
(10)
22-0163
CD 1
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal filed for the property located at 464 North Crane Boulevard.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 

  1. DETERMINE, that based on the whole of the administrative record as supported by the justification prepared and found in the administrative case file, the Project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions contained in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines regarding location, cumulative impacts, significant effects or unusual circumstances, scenic highways, or hazardous waste sites, or historical resources apply.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the East Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (ELAAPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Crane Boulevard Safety Coalition (Representative: Jamie T. Hall, Channel Law Group, LLP), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the ELAAPC in approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for the construction, use, maintenance of a new, three-story, 45 feet in height, 3,633 square foot single-family dwelling with a 533­ square foot attached garage, on an 8,914.1 square foot vacant lot; for the property located at 464 North Crane Boulevard.

Applicant: Rachel Foullon and Ian Cooper

Representative: Simon Storey, Anonymous Architects

Case No. DIR-2020-427-SPP

Environmental No.: ENV­-2020-­428-­CE-­1A
 
Related Case No.: DIR-­2020-­427-­SPP­-1A
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The ELAAPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(11)
22-0899
CD 10
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the inclusion of the Cornelius Johnson Residence and Olympic Oak, located at 1156 South Hobart Boulevard, in the list of Historic-Cultural Monuments.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 

  1. DETERMINE that the proposed designation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 15308, Class 8 and Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
     
  2. DETERMINE that the subject property conforms with the definition of a Monument pursuant to Section 22.171.7 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code.
     
  3. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Cultural Heritage Commission (CHC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  4. APPROVE the recommendations of the CHC relative to the inclusion of the Cornelius Johnson Residence and Olympic Oak, located at 1156 South Hobart Boulevard, in the list of Historic-Cultural Monuments.

Applicants: Susan D. Anderson, California African American Museum, and Christian Kosmas Mayer

Owner: KLD Investment, LLC

Case No. CHC-2022-3207-HCM

Environmental No. ENV-2022-3208-CE
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the CHC. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 26, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 26, 2023)

   
(12)
22-1526
CD 1
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal for the properties located at 500, 500 ½, 502, 502 ½, 508, 510, 510 ¼, 510 ½, 512, 512 ¼, and 512 ½ South Union Avenue.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 

  1. DETERMINE, that based on the whole of the administrative record as supported by the justification prepared and found in the environmental case file, the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Enrique Velasquez, Coalition for an Equitable Westlake MacArthur Park and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the Director of Planning in approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a proposed qualifying Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities project involving the demolition of five existing residential apartment buildings that contain 14 dwelling units for the construction, use, and maintenance of an 85-­unit residential apartment building, of which eight dwelling units will be reserved for Very Low Income Households and four dwelling units will be reserved for Extremely Low Income Households; the building will total 77 feet 8 inches in height and be constructed with five residential floors over two levels of parking containing 43 vehicle parking spaces, 66 long-term bicycle parking spaces, and 7 short-term bicycle parking spaces; the Project will contain 64,309 square feet of floor area for a maximum Floor Area Ratio of 4.5:1; the unit mix will be comprised of 80 one-bedroom apartments and five two-bedroom apartments; there will be 6,500 square feet of open space, comprised of 1,500 square feet of private open space and 5,000 square feet of common open space on the third floor and roof; the subject property contains five non­-protected trees on­-site, one of which has a trunk diameter greater than or equal to eight inches, the Project includes the removal of the five non-protected trees on-­site and the export of 2,800 cubic yards of dirt; for the properties located at 500, 500 ½, 502, 502 ½, 508, 510, 510 ¼, 510 ½, 512, 512 ¼, and 512 ½ South Union Avenue.

Applicant: Ramin Shilian, 500 Union, LLC

Representative: Jacques Mashihi, West Pacifica Design

Case No.: DIR-­2020-­1867-­TOC­-HCA

Environmental No.: ENV­-2020-­1868-­CE­-1A

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(13)
20-0539
CD 1
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to an appeal filed for the continued operation of the hotel, known as the Stuart Hotel, located at 718 South Union Avenue.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 

  1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, as supported by the justification prepared and found in the case file, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15321, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions contained in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA guidelines regarding location, cumulative impacts, significant effects or unusual circumstances, scenic highways or hazardous waste sites or historical resources applies.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS, as modified by the PLUM Committee on May 2, 2023, as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by the following: 1) Pravin Ahir (Representative: Frank A. Weiser, Esq., Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser), 2) Mayur B. Patel (Representative: Frank A. Weiser, Esq., Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser); and, 3) Balubhai G. Patel, Individually and as Trustee of Balubhai Patel Trust (Representative: Frank A. Weiser, Esq., Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the Zoning Administrator on Case No. DIR-2002-3323-RV-PA2, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1, for the continued imposition of Conditions is necessary in order to mitigate the land use impacts caused by the property; in denying the request for modification of Condition Nos. 1 and 5; in modifying Condition Nos. 1, 5, 9, 15, 16, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34; in adding Condition Nos. 35 and 36; and in deleting Condition Nos. 11, 22, and 30; for the continued operation of the hotel, known as the Stuart Hotel, located at 718 South Union Avenue, subject to Conditions of Approval, as modified by the PLUM Committee on May 2, 2023.
     
  4. ADOPT the removal of the language, “or other illegal activity” from Condition No. 15; and removal of Condition Nos. 17 and 32.

Applicant: Balubhai G. Patel

Representative: Frank A. Weiser Esq., Law Offices of Frank A. Weiser

Case No. DIR-­2002-­3323-­RV-­PA2

Environmental No. ENV-­2018-­5644-­CE
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(14)
21-1113
CD 13
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal for the properties located at 7445 West Sunset Boulevard (7441 – 7449 West Sunset Boulevard and 1506 – 1516 North Gardner Street).
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 

  1. DETERMINE, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the Project is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15305 Class 5 (Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations), and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Central Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (CLAAPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL jointly filed by Julia Mason, Cheryl Holland, Lincoln Williamson, and Michael Konik, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the CLAAPC in approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for the sale and dispensing of a full line of alcoholic beverages for on-­site consumption in conjunction with a proposed 3,171 square-­foot restaurant, inclusive of 602 square feet of basement storage area, with a total of 128 indoor seats and 731 square feet of on-site uncovered outdoor patio space with 71 outdoor seats, all divided between three venues; the proposed hours of operation are 7:00 am to 11:00 pm, daily; for the properties located at 7445 West Sunset Boulevard (7441 – 7449 West Sunset Boulevard and 1506 – 1516 North Gardner Street).

Applicant: Michael Towles, Gaggle’s Inc. 

Representative: Margaret Taylor, Apex LA 

Case No.: ZA-2019-6319-CUB-1A 

Environmental No.: ENV-2019-6320-CE-1A
 

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The CLAAPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted.

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(15)
22-0574-S1
CD 11
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (SCEA), MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Site Plan Review appeal for the properties located at 6501 - 6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard and 6502 - 6520 South Arizona Avenue.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:​
 
  1. FIND, pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21155.2, after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the SB 375 Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment, No. ENV-2021-4938-SCEA, and all comments received, after imposition of all mitigation measures there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND that the City Council held a hearing on and adopted the SCEA on September 30, 2022 pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b)(6); FIND the project is a “transit priority project” as defined by PRC Section 21155 and the project has incorporated all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in prior Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), including Southern California Association of Governments’ 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy EIR Schedule No. 20199011061; FIND all potentially significant effects required to be identified in the initial study have been identified and analyzed in the SCEA; FIND with respect to each significant effect on the environment required to be identified in the initial study for the SCEA, changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project that avoid or mitigate the significant effects to a level of insignificance or those changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been, or can and should be, adopted by that other agency; FIND the SCEA reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND the mitigation measures have been made enforceable conditions on the project; and ADOPT the SCEA and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program prepared for the SCEA.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (Representative: Victoria Yundt,, Lozeau Drury, LLP), and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in approving a Site Plan Review, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 16.05, for a development project creating 50 or more residential dwelling units; for the demolition of an existing commercial shopping center, industrial building, and associated surface parking lots, the maintenance of an existing one-story commercial restaurant building, and the construction, use, and maintenance of a new eight-story mixed-use building with 362 residential units and approximately 3,700 square feet of new commercial space on the ground floor; 41 residential units will be reserved for Very Low Income households, the Project will provide 520 vehicle parking spaces; for the properties located at 6501 – 6521 South Sepulveda Boulevard and 6502 – 6520 South Arizona Avenue, subject to Modified Conditions of Approval.

Applicant: FRH Realty, LLC

Representative: Jonathan Lonner, Burns and Bouchard, Incorporated

Case No.: CPC­-2021-­4937-­CU-­DB-­SPR-­WDI-­HCA­-1A

Environmental No.: ENV­-2021-­4938-­SCEA

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(16)
21-1496
CD 10
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Revocation appeals filed for the discontinuance of the magazine/tobacco shop with tobacco sales, known as the Rasta Smoke Shop, located at 4058 South Crenshaw Boulevard.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, as supported by the justification prepared and found in the environmental case file, the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15321, of the State’s CEQA Guidelines for enforcement actions by regulatory agencies and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions contained in Section 15300.2 of the State CEQA Guidelines regarding location, cumulative impacts, significant effects or unusual circumstances, scenic highways, or hazardous waste sites, or historical resources applies.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Department of City Planning (DCP), Zoning Administrator, as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEALS filed by Amjad Ibrahim, Rasta Smoke Shop and Mini Mart, and Rosalie Odell, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the Zoning Administrator on Case No.  DIR-2021-1780-RV-1A, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 12.27.1, in requiring the imposition of Condition Nos. 1 (Fee), 2 (Covenant Recording), 3 (Acknowledgment of New Operator), and 4 (Plan Approval for New Operator), pursuant to Section 12.27.1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, for the discontinuance of the magazine/tobacco shop with tobacco sales, known as the Rasta Smoke Shop and any similar land uses at the property, located at 4058 South Crenshaw Boulevard with additional terms and conditions, listed in the Letter of Determination dated December 6, 2021, attached to the Council file.
     
Applicant: City of Los Angeles, Office of Zoning Administration

Case No. DIR­-2021-­1780­-RV­-1A

Environmental No. ENV­-2021-­1781-­CE

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the DCP. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(17)
23-0164
CD 12
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, MITIGATION MEASURES, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Conditional Use Permit appeal for the property located at 9201 North Winnetka Avenue.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:​
 
  1. FIND, pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Case No. ENV-2021-10280-MND, and all comments received, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND the mitigation measures have been made enforceable conditions on the Project; and ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program prepared for the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC), as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by Marianne King, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in approving a Conditional Use, pursuant to Section 12.24 U.14 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, to permit a Major Development Project to allow the construction, use and maintenance of a 273,000 square-foot manufacturing, light industrial (including studio/movie/television/sound production), and/or warehousing; for the demolition of approximately 140,000 square feet of floor area and the construction of three buildings to be used for manufacturing, light industrial (including studio production/movie/television/sound production), or warehousing, with a total floor area of approximately 273,500 square feet; for the property located at 9201 North Winnetka Avenue, subject to Modified Conditions of Approval, as modified by the PLUM Committee on April 18, 2023, attached to the Council file.

Applicant: Jill Saperstein, Wincal, LLC

Representative: Brad Rosenheim, Rosenheim & Associates, Inc.

Case No. CPC-­2021-­10278-­CU-­1A

Environmental No. ENV­-2021-­10280

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
(18)
21-1025
CD 5
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal for a Plan Approval filed for the property located at 9101 West Pico Boulevard.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. RESOLVE TO GRANT THE APPEAL filed by Neighbors for a Safe Environment (Representative: Amy C. Minteer, Chatten-Brown, Carstens and Minteer, LLP), and THEREBY OVERTURN the West Los Angeles Area Planning Commission’s (WLAAPC) determination in approving a Categorical Exemption, No. ENV-­2020-­1328-­CE, for a Plan Approval to review the effectiveness and the Applicant's compliance with conditions imposed in Case Nos. BZA-2000­-1697 and ZA-­17683(PAD) for the existing 0.706-­acre West Pico Oil Drill Site; there is no request for modification of any existing condition of approval and no proposed expansion of the use; this review is required by Paragraph 4.b of the June 2001 Settlement Agreement in the case of Neighbors For A Safe Environment v. City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC240760, and conducted pursuant to Section 12.24 M of the Los Angeles Municipal Code and Condition No. 78 in Case Nos. BZA-­2000­-1697 and ZA-­17683(PAD); for the property located at 9101 West Pico Boulevard.
     
  2. INSTRUCT the Director of Planning, DCP, to prepare the necessary CEQA analysis and findings consistent with Council’s findings; and INSTRUCT that a new CEQA determination be set for a new hearing for the WLAAPC’s consideration.

Applicant: Phil Brown, Pacific Coast Energy Company

Representative: Mike Finch, Energy Project Solutions LLC

Case No. ZA-­1989-­17683-­PA2-­1A

Environmental No. ENV-­2020-­1328-­CE-­1A

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The WLAAPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: Yes

For: South Robertson Neighborhood Council 

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   

Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(19)
21-1073-S1
CD 9
MOTION (PRICE - HUTT) relative to a reimbursement from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) to fund and construct up to $27.3 million in necessary improvements in the City’s right-of-way for the Rail to Rail Corridor Project.
   
 

Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

AUTHORIZE the Los Angeles Department of Transportation to:
 

  1. Appropriate $3,830,000 within Transportation Grant Fund No. 655/94 from Available Cash Balance to a new account entitled “Rail to Rail Multi-Year Subregional Program” for the initial Rail to Rail Project payment to the Metro, in conformance with C-140832, subject to the approval by Metro of the letter of no prejudice request.
     
  2. Accept reimbursements from Metro related to the Rail to Rail Project and deposit said reimbursements into Transportation Grant Fund No. 655/94.

   
(20)
19-0652-S1
MOTION (PARK - HERNANDEZ) relative to funding for any aspect of the LGBT Heritage Month event.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 

  1. UTILIZE $10,000 in the Council's portion of the Heritage Month Celebration Special Events line item in the General City Purposes Fund No. 100/56 to fund any aspect of the LGBT Heritage Month event.
     
  2. DIRECT and AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to prepare, process and execute the necessary documents and/or payments, directly with the vendor/service provider, and / or any other agency or organization, as appropriate, in the above amount, for the above purpose, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form, if needed.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion, and including any corrections and changes to fund or account numbers; said corrections / clarifications / changes may be made orally, electronically or by any other means.

   
(21)
22-1045
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE L.A. FOR KIDS STEERING COMMITTEE, CITY ATTORNEY,  ORDINANCE OF INTENTION FIRST CONSIDERATION, and RESOLUTIONS relative to the 2023-24 Proposition K Assessment.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. APPROVE the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report.
     
  2. ADOPT the City Engineer's Report for the 2023-24 Proposition K Assessment (Attachment 10 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION OF INTENTION to levy an assessment authorized by Proposition K, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Attachment 11 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  4. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE OF INTENTION, dated April 24, 2023, to levy an assessment authorized by Proposition K, pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Attachment 12 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  5. APPROVE the 2022-23 maintenance awards totaling $5 million (Attachment 9 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  6. APPROVE the reprogramming of 2022-23 funding allocations (Attachments 1 and 13 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  7. APPROVE the 2022-23 Proposition K inflation awards totaling $1.07 million (Attachment 14 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  8. APPROVE the 2022-23 Proposition K additional specified GAP funding awards totaling $12.1 million (Attachment 15 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file).
     
  9. AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to execute or amend grant agreements with Proposition K grantees that are recommended for 2022-23 project allocations (Attachment 1 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), and as needed to effectuate the 2022-23 maintenance awards (Attachment 9 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), and reprogramming actions (Attachment 13 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), subject to approval of the City Attorney.
     
  10. AUTHORIZE the Controller to adjust accounts pursuant to instructions to be provided by the City Administrative Officer (CAO), for current year maintenance awards (Attachment 9 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), reprogramming actions (Attachment 13 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), inflation awards (Attachment 14 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), and additional Specified (GAP) funding (Attachment 15 to the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), within the following Proposition K Funds: Projects Fund No. 43K; Maintenance Fund No. 43L; and, Administration Fund No. 43M.
     
  11. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to publish notice by MAY 31, 2023, of a public hearing to take place on JUNE 13, 2023 at 10 a.m., during the regular Council meeting.
     
  12. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance Confirming the Assessment for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023-24 to be considered during the public hearing on JUNE 13, 2023.
     
  13. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to set an agenda item for public hearing on the Council agenda for JUNE 13, 2023, to include the following actions:
     
    1. Acknowledge that the City Council's action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Article II, Section 2.i of the City's CEQA guidelines, because the underlying project has already been evaluated and processed in accordance with the City CEQA Guidelines, with respect to the projects in List 3 of Attachment 8 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.
       
    2. Acknowledge that a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project and will be reviewed and considered by the City Council as part of the final approval of the project, with respect to the projects in List 4 of Attachment 8 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.
       
    3. Acknowledge that these are projects that may be considered for funding after CEQA compliance; no further action is required at this time, with respect to the projects in List 5 of Attachment 8 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.
       
    4. Present and adopt the Ordinance Confirming the Assessment, as prepared and transmitted by the City Attorney, confirming the assessments and approving the diagram for the District for FY 2023-24.
       
    5. Instruct the City Engineer to record a Notice of Assessment with the County Recorder.
       
    6. Approve the 2023-24 Four Year Plan for the L.A. for Kids Program and related schedules, as set forth in Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file.
       
    7. Approve the 2023-24 allocation of administrative funds up to the following amounts within Proposition K Fund No. 43M, as set forth in Attachment 7 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file:
           
      Department   Amount
      Public Works (PW)/Bureau of Engineering   $214,290
      PW/Board/Office of Accounting   136,457
      Office of the CAO    78,000
      Office  of  the  Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA)       33,356
      Total:   $462,103
           
    8. Instruct the Information Technology Agency (ITA) to prepare the assessment file containing the assessment levy information confirmed by the City Council for 2023-24 for each parcel in the Assessment District and make it available to the Bureau of Engineering to verify and transmit to the County.
       
    9. Authorize the City Engineer to negotiate and execute Proposition K grant agreements with grantees that are recommended for 2023-24 project allocations (Attachment 1 of the April 27, 2023 L.A. for Kids Steering Committee report, attached to the Council file), except for competitive projects awarded to City departments, subject to approval of the City Attorney.
       
    10. Authorize the Controller to:

       
      1. Set up accounts for the 2023-24 Proposition K assessment within the following Funds, pursuant to instructions to be provided by the CAO: Proposition K Projects Fund No. 43K; Proposition K Maintenance Fund No. 43L; and, Proposition K Administration Fund No. 43M.
         
      2. Increase the 2023-24 appropriations for the ITA by $50,000 from Proposition K Fund No. 43K/10, Account No. (TBD) - ITA to Fund No. 100/32, Account No. 9350 - Communication Service Request.
         
      3. Transfer cash from Proposition K Fund No. 43K/10 on an as-needed basis upon proper documentation from the ITA and approval by the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) Program Managers and CAO.
         
      4. Transfer assessment revenues to the appropriate Program Funds in the approximate percentage distribution, and up to the amounts reflected below: 
                 
        Proposition K Fund  
        Percentage
        Distribution
          Year 27 Total
        43K/10 – Capital Projects   77.11%   $19,276,725
        43L/10 – Maintenance   20%   5,000,000
        43M/10 – Administration   1.85%          462,103
        Total:   100%   $25,000,000
                 
      5. Instruct the City Engineer, CAO, CLA, and Board of Public Works, Office of Accounting to submit journal voucher requests supported by the documentation of work order charges for program administrative and project construction management staffing costs to the CAO.
         
      6. Instruct the Department of General Services (GSD) and the Department of Recreation and Parks (RAP) to submit expenditure reports to the BOE and the CAO on a monthly basis.
         
      7. Authorize  the  City  Engineer  to  make  technical  corrections  to  the  City Engineer's Report to reflect the intent of the Council action.
         
      8. Authorize the CAO to make funding adjustments and prepare technical adjustments as needed to fully commit annual assessment funds and carry out the intent of the Council action; and, Authorize the Controller to implement those technical adjustments.
         
      9. Authorize the Controller, pursuant to instructions provided by the CAO, to revert residual funds within Proposition K Funds to the originating Proposition K project accounts for projects completed by the GSD and the RAP as part of ongoing program reconciliation activities.

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee reports that adoption of the Ordinance and Resolution of Intention to Levy the Proposition K: L.A. for Kids Assessment for Fiscal Year 2023-24 indicates the Council's intention to levy assessments totaling $25 million to acquire and construct park and recreational and cultural facilities serving youth. The assessment can only be used for capital improvements, acquisition of land, Proposition K Program administration and maintenance of completed projects. The operating cost for Proposition K projects completed in future years will be funded by the annual operating budget adopted for City departments and with independent funding for projects operated by external entities. For Fiscal Year 2023-24, $5 million in General Fund reimbursements are anticipated for program administration ($0.46 million) and maintenance ($4.56 million) as identified in the report findings, section. The RAP reports an annual fiscal impact of $6.05 million once active Proposition K projects, currently in various stages of development, become operational over future years. This includes $2.57 million for maintenance and $3.48 million for operations. The fiscal impact for completed projects will be partially offset by Proposition K maintenance funding. However, this annual offset will no longer be available once the Proposition K Program ends in 2026-27. In 2022-23, the RAP will receive an award of $4.38 million for current year maintenance awards.

   
 

Financial Policies Statement: The L.A. for Kids Steering Committee reports that the actions recommended in this report comply with the City’s Financial Policies.

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

(Neighborhoods and Community Enrichment Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   
(22)
22-0535-S2
CD 14
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING (DCP), LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPELLANT, CREED LA, relative to the withdrawal of a Site Plan Review appeal filed for the properties located at 635 - 657 South Mesquit Street, 632 - 648 South Santa Fe Avenue, and 1585 East Jesse Street.
   
 

  1. COMMUNICATION FROM THE DCP RELATIVE TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPEAL

    Recommendation for Council action:

    WITHDRAW Case No. CPC-2020-6828-GPA-ZC-HD-SPR-MCUP-1A in Council file No. 22-0535-S2, inasmuch as the appellant, CREED LA, withdrew the Site Plan Review appeal by written notice dated October 28, 2022, attached to the Council file; therefore, the LACPC's actions relative to the Site Plan Review for Planning Case No. CPC-2020-6828-GPA-ZC-HD-SPR-MCUP are final.
     
  2. COMMUNICATION FROM THE LACPC AND APPEAL

    Appeal filed by the CREED LA (Representative: Darien Key), from the determination of the LACPC in approving a Site Plan Review for a project that results in an increase of 50,000 square feet or more of non-residential uses, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 16.05;  for a project involving the construction, use, and maintenance of a 188,954 square-foot,14-story, commercial office building with 4,325 square feet of commercial ground floor; the project will provide a total of 397 vehicle parking spaces and 146 bicycle parking spaces within five levels of above grade parking, and two levels of subterranean parking; for the properties located at 635 - 657 South Mesquit Street, 632 - 648 South Santa Fe Avenue, and 1585 East Jesse Street.

Applicant: 655 Mesquit, LLC

Representative: Mark Falcone c/o Roger Pecsock

Case No. CPC-2020-6828-GPA-ZC-HD-SPR-MCUP-1A

Environmental No. ENV-2020-6829-MND

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
 

(Motion Required)

   
(23)
22-0807
CD 13
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING (DCP), LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION (LACPC), and APPELLANT'S REPRESENTATIVE, LOZEAU DRURY LLP, relative to the withdrawal of a Site Plan Review appeal filed by Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) for the properties located at 6007 West Sunset Boulevard, 6001 - 6023 West Sunset Boulevard, 1503 - 1517 North Gordon Street, and 1506 - 1512 North La Baig Avenue.
   
 

  1. COMMUNICATION FROM THE DCP RELATIVE TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPEAL

    Recommendation for Council action:

    WITHDRAW Case No. CPC-2021-1557-DB-SPR-HCA-1A in Council file No. 22-0807, inasmuch as the appellant, SAFER, withdrew the Site Plan Review appeal by written notice dated July 29, 2022, attached to the Council file; therefore, the LACPC’s actions relative to the Site Plan Review for Planning Case No. CPC-2021-1557-DB-SPR-HCA is final.
     
  2. COMMUNICATION FROM THE LACPC AND APPEAL

    Appeal filed by SAFER (Representative: Victoria Yundt, Lozeau Drury LLP), from the determination of the LACPC in approving a Site Plan Review for a development project that results in an increase of 50  or more dwelling units or guest rooms, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 16.05;  for a project involving demolition of existing structures and the construction, use and maintenance of a new seven-story mixed-use development with 109 dwelling units (including 14 units - 15 percent of the base density set aside for Very Low-Income Households); 14,657 square feet of ground floor commercial uses; and 9,834 square feet of open space; the project would provide a total of 196 automobile parking spaces within one subterranean and three above ground level of parking and a total of 148 bicycle spaces;  for the properties located at 6007 West Sunset Boulevard, 6001 - 6023 West Sunset Boulevard, 1503 - 1517 North Gordon Street, and 1506 - 1512 North La Baig Avenue.

Applicant: 6007 Sunset (LA), LLC

Representative: Michael Gonzales, Gonzales Law Group

Case No. CPC-2021-1557-DB-SPR-HCA-1A

Environmental No. ENV-2021-1558-CE

   
 

Fiscal Impact Statement: Not applicable 

   
 

Community Impact Statement: None submitted

   
 

TIME LIMIT FILE - MAY 12, 2023

   
 

(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - MAY 12, 2023)

   
 

(Motion Required)

   
(24)
21-1177-S1
CD 8
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (HARRIS-DAWSON - RAMAN) relative to funding for the Manchester Urban Homes Project located at 8721-8765 South Broadway Avenue in Council District 8.
   
 

Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 

  1. DIRECT the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD), or designee, to:
     
    1. Effectuate a loan of up to $7,000,000 from the City of Los Angeles Housing Impact Trust Fund to Manchester Urban Homes, L.P., for the Manchester Urban Homes Development Project located at 8721-8765 South Broadway Avenue.
       
    2. Draft, negotiate and execute loan documents to provide a loan of up to $7,000,000 for the Manchester Urban Homes Development Project, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.
       
    3. Report within 90 days on the final amount of the loan and all funding sources.
       
  2. AUTHORIZE the Controller to obligate up to $7,000,000 for the Manchester Urban Homes Development Project, as appropriated within the City of Los Angeles Housing Impact Trust Fund No. 43/59T, Appropriation Account No. 43W23 - Rental New Construction, to fund a deferred payment loan with the terms and conditions approved by Council in the Affordable Housing Managed Pipeline guidelines (Council file No. 22-0876); and, EXPEND funds upon proper written demand of the General Manager, LAHD, or designee.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to make any necessary technical corrections consistent with the Mayor and Council actions, subject to the approval of the City Administrative Officer; and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement these instructions.

   
 

(Housing and Homelessness Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

   

Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Closed Session

(25)
23-0464
The City Council may recess to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1), to confer with its legal counsel relative to the case entitled David Kagan v. City of Los Angeles, Supreme Court of the United States Case No. 22-739. (This matter involves the discussion of ongoing litigation against the City.)
   
 

(Budget, Finance and Innovation Committee waived consideration of this matter)

   

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).