Meeting
  City Logo

AGENDA

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL
 

  
    Wednesday, June 15, 2022

10:00 AM

JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

ROOM 340, CITY HALL

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com		  
President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
  BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
  NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT HERB J. WESSON, JR., Tenth District
  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
  KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District
  JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District
Listening To, Attending, and Providing Public Comment at City Council Meetings
The Council meetings will be broadcast live on Cable Television Channel 35, on the internet at https://clerk.lacity.org/calendar, and on YouTube. The live audio of the hearing will be available via telephone at: (213) 621-CITY (Metro), (818) 904-9450 (Valley), (310) 471-CITY (Westside), and (310) 547-CITY (San Pedro Area). If the live video or audio is unavailable via one of these channels, members of the public should try another channel.
Members of the public may also attend the Council meetings in-person. Live, oral public comment will be taken in-person, only, and not via teleconference. Please note that, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 200.123, proof of full Covid-19 vaccination or of a negative Covid-19 test within the prior 72 hours will be required to enter the City Hall building for any purpose. Proof of a negative test requires a printed document, email, or text message displayed on a phone from a test provider or laboratory showing the results of a PCR or antigen Covid-19 test. Additionally, pursuant to Mayoral directives, indoor masking will be required regardless of vaccination status or proof of a negative test. Written public comment may be submitted at LACouncilComment.com.
Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information below.
Telecommunication Relay Services
Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications.
Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.
What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.

SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL

 

BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or [email protected].

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.

 

Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Wednesday, June 15, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(1)
22-0533
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a proposed agreement between the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and Motorola Solutions, Inc., for the purchase, installation and hosting of an automated license plate recognition system.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, or designee, to execute the proposed agreement, contained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May 3, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22-0533, with Motorola Solutions, Inc., for automated license plate recognition services. The term of the agreement is five years from the date of execution, and a maximum allowable compensation not to exceed $2,035,000, or $407,000 annually, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form. Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendation stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to enter into an agreement with Motorola Solutions, Inc., for automated license plate recognition services. The term of the agreement is five years with a maximum allowable compensation not to exceed $407,000 annually, or $2,035,000 over the five-year term. Funding for the purchase of equipment, installation, licensing and hosting services is provided in the LAPD’s 2021-22 Adopted Budget Office and Administrative Account. Funding for subsequent years is subject to approval by the Mayor and Council. There is no additional impact to the General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendation stated in said report is in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that one-time revenues will be used to support one-time expenditures. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 5, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(2)
14-1315-S1
CD 2
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a lease agreement with Milan Rei VIII, LLC (Milan) for 8,661 rentable square feet of office space for Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) use located at 6400 Laurel Canyon Boulevard.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to negotiate and execute a lease agreement with Milan for 8,661 rentable square feet of office space located at 6400 Laurel Canyon Boulevard, Suite 610, Los Angeles, California 91606 for LAHD use under the terms and conditions substantially outlined in the Municipal Facilities Committee (MFC) report dated May 19, 2022, attached to the Council file. Fiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no General Fund impact. The LAHD will pay the lease directly from the Rent Stabilization Trust Fund and Systematic Code Enforcement Fee Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 18, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(3)
21-0722
CD 3
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a new lease agreement with the Canoga Park Community Center Foundation to serve as a community meeting space located at 7248 Owensmouth Avenue.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the Department of General Services to negotiate and execute a new lease agreement with the Canoga Park Community Center Foundation located at 7248 Owensmouth Avenue, Canoga Park, CA 91303 under the terms and conditions substantially outlined in the Municipal Facilities Committee (MFC) report dated May 16, 2022, attached to the Council file. Fiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no impact on the General Fund as no revenue would be generated from this lease and the non-profit lessee is responsible for the cost of operations and maintenance of the facility. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 15, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(4)
12-1549
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to augmenting and extending the term for the City’s panel of pre-qualified real estate and economic development professionals performing services for asset management planning and economic development.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. APPROVE the updated List of Pre-Qualified Real Estate and Economic Development Consultants [Attachment A of the Municipal Facilities Committee (MFC) report dated May 26, 2022, attached to the Council file] augmented through the March 2, 2022 Supplemental Request for Qualifications, and exercise the two one-year extension options for a new term from June 25, 2022 through June 24, 2024.
     
  2. AUTHORIZE the City Administrative Officer (CAO), or designee, to solicit bids and execute contracts with prequalified firms on an as-needed basis, subject to compliance with the City’s contracting policies, funding availability, and approval by the City Attorney as to form.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Managers, or designee(s), of departments requiring the expedited access and pre-qualified services of consultants from the updated list (Attachment A of said MFC report), to solicit bids from and execute contracts with prequalified firms on an as-needed basis, subject to compliance with the City’s contracting policies, any additional business outreach requirements, funding availability, and approval by the City Attorney as to form.
     
  4. AUTHORIZE the CAO to make technical corrections, as necessary.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The MFC reports that there is no immediate impact to the General Fund from approval of the recommendation to augment and extend the List of Pre-Qualified Real Estate and Economic Development Consultants. Subsequent use of the list without an approved source of funds may result in an impact on the General Fund and will require Council approval. Financial Policies Statement: The MFC reports that the above recommendations comply with the City Financial Policies, in that any resulting solicitation or contract expenditures are required to be approved and part of the Adopted Budget or have secured interim Council and Mayoral approval. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 25, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(5)
22-0569
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a contract with 3Di, Inc. (3Di) for maintenance and support services of the MyLA311 Customer Relationship Management system.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Information Technology Agency (ITA), or designee, to execute a contract with 3Di for maintenance and support services of the MyLA311 Customer Relationship Management system for a term of 14 months retroactive beginning February 3, 2022 through April 2, 2023, with a total compensation amount of $1 million, subject to 3Di’s submission of various contracting documents and the approval of the City Attorney. Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Administrative Officer (CAO) reports that funding for the proposed Contract is available in ITA’s Contractual Services Account. The impact to the General Fund is limited to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the above recommendation is in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies as current year and future year expenditures are limited to the appropriation of funds in the budget. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 11, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(6)
15-0190-S2
CD 15
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a non-profit lease agreement with The Little Italy of Los Angeles Association for space in the City-owned building located at 638 South Beacon Street.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Buscaino - Lee):

INSTRUCT the Department of General Services, with the assistance of the City Attorney and the City Administrative Officer (CAO), to negotiate a non-profit lease agreement with The Little Italy of Los Angeles Association for space in the City-owned building located at 638 South Beacon Street, Los Angeles, CA 90731. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(7)
09-2013
CD 1
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Highland Park 2020-2024 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Annual Planning Report.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. FIND that:
     
    1. The Annual Planning Report, attached to the Council file, for the Highland Park 2020-2024 BID's 2021 FY complies with the requirements of the State Law.
       
    2. The increase in the 2021 budget concurs with the intentions of the Highland Park 2020-2024 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
      ​​​​​
  2. ADOPT the Annual Planning Report for the Highland Park 2020-2024 BID's 2021 FY, attached to the Council file, pursuant to the State Law.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(8)
17-0981-S9
CD 12
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to activating a new streamlined permitting land use regulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage Program, in Council District 12.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Resolution (Lee - Blumenfield):
 
  1. RESOLVE, that by the adoption of the Resolution attached to the Council file, inclusive of the Map (Exhibit A) and Findings (Exhibit B) attached to the Resolution, the Council hereby activates a new streamlined permitting land use regulatory process, the Restaurant Beverage Program that shall be in force and full effect in the geographical boundaries attached in Exhibit A.
     
  2. RESOLVE, that based on the Findings outlined in Exhibit B relative to the geographic boundaries found in the Exhibit A maps, the Restaurant Beverage Program is in conformity with the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis on this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(9)
22-1200-S24
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the appointment of Ms. Stacey Pruitt to the South Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (SLAAPC).
   
 
Recommendation for Council action:

RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Ms. Stacey Pruitt to the SLAAPC for the term ending June 30, 2024, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Ms. Pruitt resides in Council District 10. (Current Composition: M = 1; F = 2)

Financial Disclosure Statement: Filed

Background Check: Pending
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JUNE 27, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JUNE 24, 2022)
 
(10)
22-1200-S27
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the appointment of Ms. Cynthia Gonzalez to the South Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (SLAAPC).
   
 
Recommendation for Council action:

RESOLVE that the Mayor’s appointment of Ms. Cynthia Gonzalez to the SLAAPC for the term ending June 30, 2023, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED. Ms. Gonzalez resides in Council District 15. (Current Composition: M = 1; F = 3)

Financial Disclosure Statement: Pending

Background Check: Pending
 Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 7, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
 
(11)
22-0404
ORDINANCE SECOND CONSIDERATION relative to the proposed 2022 Annual Weed and Brush Abatement Program.

(Communications from the Board of Public Works and City Attorney adopted on June 8, 2022)
   
  Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(12)
22-0081
COMMUNICATION FROM DEPARTMENT OF AGING relative to additional grant funding from the California Department of Aging (CDA) under Area Plan Fiscal Year 2021-22, Amendment No. 3, amending the Senior and Family Caregiver Fiscal Year 2021-22 contracts for Older Americans Act funding, and American Rescue Plan funding.

(Arts, Parks, Health, Education, and Neighborhoods Committee report to be submitted in Council. If public hearing is not held in Committee, an opportunity for public comment will be provided.)

(Click on www.lacouncilfile.com for background documents.)
   
  Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(13)
16-0358
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Amendments to Contract No. C-129255 between the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA) to provide law enforcement services for the transit system infrastructure, bus and rail lines.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, or designee, to execute the Third Amendment to Contract No. C-129255, contained in the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May 11, 2022, attached to Council file No. 16-0358, with the LACMTA and increase the maximum allowable compensation by $38,628,480 from $390,857,017 to $429,485,497 to provide law enforcement services for the LACMTA public transit system.
     
  2. AUTHORIZE the Chief of Police, or designee, to execute the Fourth Amendment to Contract No. C-129255, attached to the Council file, with the LACMTA that incorporates language requiring employees to comply with an enforced COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the LAPD to prepare Controller instructions for any technical adjustments, as necessary, subject to the approval of the CAO; and, authorize the Controller to implement the instructions.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that approval of the recommendations stated in this report will authorize the LAPD to execute the Third Amendment to Contract No. C-129255 with the LACMTA authorizing an increase to expenditures by $38,628,480, from $390,857,017 to $429,485,497. In addition, the recommendations authorize the LAPD to execute a Fourth Amendment with the LACMTA that incorporates language requiring employees to comply with the COVID-19 vaccination mandate. All other terms remain the same. Reimbursement for services provided will be deposited into Revenue Source Code 4603, Service to LACMTA. There is no additional impact to the General Fund. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations stated in this report are in compliance with the City’s Financial Policies in that the City will be reimbursed for services provided, based on the full cost of operations. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JULY 11, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JULY 1, 2022)
  (Budget and Finance Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(14)
22-0496
CD 11
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the CONSIDERATION OF AND DETERMINATION RELATED TO A STATUTORY EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE 21080.27(B)(1) (ENV NO-2018-6667-SE); and executing a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for the development of affordable housing on City-owned properties located at 2102-2120 South Pacific Avenue, 2106/2116 South Canal Street and 125/116-128/204-208/214/302/301-319/200/210-212 East Venice Boulevard (commonly known as South Venice Boulevard and/or North Venice Boulevard) in Council District 11; and related matters.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. NOTE AND FILE the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) report dated April 27, 2022, and the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May 20, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22-0496, relative to the disposition and development of the 10 City-owned parcels listed in the CAO report dated June 3, 2022, attached to Council file No. 22-0496.
     
  2. DETERMINE that the proposed affordable housing project to be located at 2102-2120 South Pacific Avenue, 2106/2116 South Canal Street and 125/ 116-128/ 204-208/ 214/ 302/ 301-319/200/210-212 East Venice Boulevard (commonly known as South Venice Boulevard and/or North Venice Boulevard) in Council District 11; is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to the statutory exemption set forth in Public Resources Code, section 21080.27(B)(1).  
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LAHD, or designee, to negotiate and execute a DDA and effectuate related documents with the selected developers Venice Community Housing Corporation and Hollywood Community Housing Corporation (Developers), or with the Developers’ to-be-formed Limited Partnership, for the 10 City-owned parcels located at 2102-2120 South Pacific Avenue, 2106/2116 South Canal Street and 125/ 116-128/ 204-208/ 214/ 302/ 301-319/200/210-212 East Venice Boulevard (commonly known as South Venice Boulevard and/or North Venice Boulevard) in Council District 11; and listed in Table 3 of the CAO report dated June 3, 2022, attached to the Council file, as a condition of financing, based on the revised Key Terms and Conditions negotiated with the Developers and attached to the CAO report dated June 3, 2022, attached to the Council file, and in substantial conformance to the Draft DDA attached to the LAHD report dated April 27, 2022, attached to the Council file, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.
     
  4. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Department of Transportation, or designee, to effectuate a non-financial transfer of jurisdiction and control of nine parcels located at 2102-2120 South Pacific Avenue, 2116 South Canal Street and 125/116-128/204-208/214/302/301-319/210-212 East Venice Boulevard (commonly known as South Venice Boulevard and/or North Venice Boulevard) in Council District 11; and listed in Table 3 of the CAO report dated June 3, 2022, attached to the Council file. (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 4238-024-900, 902, 903, 905, 906, 907, 909, 910 and 911), to the LAHD to assist in the assembly of land for the development of affordable and supportive housing, subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. Potential project funding sources include State grants, loans, or tax credits, Project-Based Section 8 vouchers, Affordable Housing Managed Pipeline funding, and private financing, among others. The revisions in this report addendum will not result in an additional cost to the City, and no funding commitments are being made at this time. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the revised recommendations in this addendum comply with the City’s Financial Policies.  Community Impact Statement: Yes

Against, unless Amended: Venice Neighborhood Council
 
 

Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(15)
22-0205
CD 13
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) appeal filed for the properties located at 505-517 North Hoover Street
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:​
 
  1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development), and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that any exceptions to a Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. RESOLVE TO DENY THE APPEAL filed by David Wheatley, North Commonweath United Neighborhood Association, and THEREBY SUSTAIN the determination of the LACPC in approving a Categorical Exemption as the environmental clearance for a proposed Tier 3 Transit Oriented Communities affordable housing project involving the demolition of one office building and two single-family houses and the construction, use, and maintenance of a six-story, 40-unit residential building, including four units reserved for Extremely Low Income household occupancy for a period of 55 years; the proposed building will encompass approximately 61,106 square feet of floor area, resulting in a Floor Area Ratio of 3.79 to 1, and rise to a maximum building height of 67 feet, and parking accommodations included 50 automobile parking spaces within the subterranean garage and a total of 44 bicycle parking spaces (four short-term and 40 long-term); for the property located at 505-517 North Hoover Street.
     
Applicant: Daniel Pourbaba, 511 Hoover LLC

Representative: Aaron Belliston, BMR Enterprises

Case No. DIR-2021-2250-TOC-HCA-1A

Environmental No. ENV-2021-2251-CE-1A
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted 
 
 
(16)
14-0366-S33
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the City's padlock enforcement actions and other cannabis enforcement measures against unlicensed cannabis businesses.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-Dawson – Rodriguez):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS) and Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to report on the status of the City’s padlock enforcement actions, including pending enforcement actions remaining in the fiscal year, resources that may be needed to complete the goal of securing all the illegal cannabis shops currently operating in the city, which LAPD estimates at 100, and any proposed adjustments to the padlock enforcement program in the upcoming fiscal year.
     
  2. REQUEST the City Attorney to issue cease and desist letters to unlicensed cannabis businesses that have been subject to padlock enforcement actions, along with any other civil actions towards permanently closing these businesses before they pose a greater public safety risk to the City’s residents.
     
  3. INSTRUCT the DCR, with the assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on best practices as it relates to cannabis enforcement measures against unlicensed cannabis businesses that other cities have in place.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(17)
22-0579
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to civil enforcement actions against unlicensed cannabis businesses and best practices for cannabis enforcement measures.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Harris-Dawson – Blumenfield – Martinez - Buscaino):
 
  1. REQUEST the City Attorney to report on all Civil Enforcement actions against unlicensed cannabis businesses that have occurred to date, and evaluate the feasibility of issuing new Cease and Desist letters that can more effectively deter the continued operation of unlicensed businesses.
     
  2. REQUEST the City Attorney to report on the feasibility of utilizing outside counsel to pursue civil enforcement actions on behalf of the City as an additional enforcement tool against illegal cannabis.
     
  3. INSTRUCT the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to report on all of the LAPD’s enforcement actions against unlicensed cannabis businesses in 2021, including additional resources that may be needed to reduce the number of unlicensed cannabis businesses, such as additional funding and staffing for utility disconnections and padlock actions.
     
  4. INSTRUCT the LAPD to report on the demographics of arrests that have been made Citywide relative to unlicensed cannabis businesses, as well as charges that have been issued to employees of unlicensed cannabis businesses.
     
  5. INSTRUCT the Department of Cannabis Regulation, with the assistance of the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), to report on best practices as it relates to cannabis enforcement measures against unlicensed cannabis businesses that other cities have in place.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(18)
22-0300
CD 11
EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) and RELATED CEQA FINDINGS, and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a Specific Plan Amendment for the property located at 1 Loyola Marymount University (LMU) Drive.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. FIND, based on the independent judgment of the decision-maker, after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, the Project was assessed in the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. ENV-2008-1342-EIR, certified on February 25, 2011; and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15162 and 15164 and the Addendum, dated September 2021, that no major revisions to the EIR are required and no subsequent EIR, or negative declaration is required for approval of the project.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present an Ordinance for a Specific Plan Amendment to the LMU Specific Plan to modify the previously approved floor area for Academic/Administrative, Residential, and Athletic Indoor uses and to allow for subsequent adjustments in the distribution of floor area among these uses; the proposed Amendment will permit the retention, renovation, use, and/or change the use of the existing sports arena (Gersten Pavilion), in conjunction with an updated Traffic Demand Management Plan; the Amendment will continue to permit the construction of a new sports arena on Campus, as was previously disclosed and approved; the Amendment will also require that LMU establish and maintain a dedicated compliance officer to further enhance communications with the Westchester community; the Amendment will not change the maximum permitted floor area or the maximum total student enrollment, faculty, staff, and on Campus residents; for the property located at 1 LMU Drive. 

    Applicant: Lynne Scarboro, LMU

    Representative: John Heintz, Latham & Watkins LLP

    Case No. CPC-2019-4651-SP

    Environmental No. ENV-2008-1342-EIR-ADD1
 Fiscal Impact Statement: There is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(19)
22-0684
CD 2

MOTION (KREKORIAN - LEE) relative to Council District (CD) 2 General City Purposes (GCP) Funds in connection to Council file (C.F.) No. 20-0600-S83.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE a total of $330,000 from General City Purposes (GCP) Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 000431 GRYD Expansion & Other Programs for Underserved Communities CD2 (C.F. 20-0600-S83) as follows:
     
    1. $212,500 to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001090, Overtime General, for services to parks in CD 2.
       
    2. $55,000 to the LAPD Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 006010, Office and Administrative for the expansion of the LAPD Cadet Program North Hollywood Park.
       
    3. $62,500 to the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 00432, Nonprofit Youth Development Programs for Underserved Communities CD 2.
       
  2. TRANSFER $310,760 from the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 00432, Nonprofit Youth Development Programs for Underserved Communities CD 2, to the Board of Public Works, Office of Community Beautification, Fund No. 100/74, Account No. 003040, Contractual Services, to fund clean ups in CD 2 coordinated by the Los Angeles Conservation Corps; and, authorize the Board of Public Works, to amend the existing contract with the Los Angeles Conservation Corps to increase the contract ceiling by $310,760 for this additional scope of work.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to amend the contract with NoHo Home Alliance (C-139951) for the additional scope for food aid assistance in CD 2 (Food Aid CD2) and to increase the contract ceiling by $20,000 to be funded by the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 00433, Food Aid CD2.
     
  4. APPROVE the following actions relative to GCP funding for Homeless Outreach in CD 2:
    ​​​​​​​
    1. Transfer $494,666 from the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No 00434, Homeless Outreach in CD2, to the Los Angeles Housing Department (LAHD) Fund No. 10A/43, Account No. TBD, for housing navigators to assist people experiencing homelessness in Council District 2 to apply for Emergency Housing Vouchers and secure housing.
       
    2. Authorize the LAHD to amend the contract with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) for this additional scope of work and to increase the contract ceiling by $494,666.
       
    3. Authorize the LAHD to prepare, process, and execute the necessary documents with LAHSA, and request that LAHSA amend its outreach subcontract with Hope of the Valley to include housing navigation and Emergency Housing Voucher utilization.
       
  5. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to place on the agenda for the first regular Council meeting on July 1, 2022 or shortly thereafter the following instructions:
    ​​​​​​​
    1. Reappropriate up to $212,500 from the unencumbered balance within the LAPD Fund No. 100/70, Account No. 001090, Overtime General, in the same amount in the same amount and into the same account that exists on June 30, 2022.
       
    2. Reappropriate up to $310,000 from the unencumbered balance within the Board of Public Works Fund No.100/74, Account No. 003040, Contractual Services, in the same amount and into the same account that exists on June 30, 2022.
       
    3. Reappropriate up to $20,000 from the unencumbered balance within the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 00433, Food Aid CD2, in the same amount and into the same account that exists on June 30, 2022.
       
    4. Reappropriate up to $251,740 from the unencumbered balance in the GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 000432 Nonprofit Youth Development Programs for Underserved Communities CD 2 and up to $130,000 from the unencumbered balance in GCP Fund No. 100/56, Account No. 000433 Food Aid CD 2 in the same amounts and into the same accounts that exist on June 30, 2022, pending the contracting process for youth development and Food Aid.
       
  6. AUTHORIZE all the above-mentioned Departments to make any technical corrections or clarifications as necessary to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
 
 
(20)
22-0566
CDs 2, 4
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONERS, and RESOLUTION relative to the conversion of Temporary Preferential Parking District (TPPD) No. 75 (Council File No. 04-2024) and expansion of the boundaries of Preferential Parking District (PPD) No. 276 (Council File No. 18-0110). 
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
  1. FIND that:
     
    1. The residents in the Studio City area of Council District Four (CD4) need immediate relief from the lack of residential parking on their blocks as a result of the thriving businesses along Ventura Boulevard.
       
    2. The expansion of PPD No. 276, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 80.58.d, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under Article 111.1.a.3 of the 2002 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
       
  2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, attached to the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) report dated May 12, 2022, attached to the Council file, to expand PPD No. 276 boundaries, pursuant to the City Council's March 16, 2016 "Rules and Procedures for Preferential Parking Districts," which currently includes the residential area generally bounded by both sides of the following blocks (unless otherwise noted):
    1. Sunshine Terrace between Picturesque Drive and Sunshine Court
       
    2. Berry Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Laurie Drive
       
    3. Sunshine Terrace between Berry Drive and Fruitland Drive
       
    4. Ridgemoor Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Berry Drive
       
    5. Tropical Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Sunshine Terrace
       
    6. Eureka Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and dead end south of Ventura Boulevard
       
    7. Farley Court between Sunshine Terrace and dead end south of Ventura Boulevard
       
    8. Fruitland Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard (north intersection) and alley south of Ventura Boulevard (south intersection) Vineland Avenue (east side) between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Fruitland Drive
       
    9. Vineland Avenue between Fruitland Drive and Lankershim Boulevard
       
    10. Willow Crest Avenue between residential area south of Ventura Boulevard and dead end south of Ventura Boulevard
       
    11. Lankershim Boulevard between alley east of Ventura Boulevard and Fredonia Drive
       
    12. Willow Crest Avenue between dead end north of Vineland Avenue and dead end south of Vineland Avenue
       
    13. Willow Crest Place between Willow Crest Avenue and dead end north of Willow Crest Avenue
       
    14. Ferryview Drive between Willow Crest Avenue and dead end south of Willow Crest Avenue
       
    15. Wrightwood Drive between Vineland Avenue and Wrightwood Place
       
    16. Wrightwood Place between Wrightwood Drive and dead end north of Wrightwood Drive
       
    17. Brill Drive between Eureka Drive and dead end south of Sunshine Terrace
       
    18. Hendley Drive between Brill Drive and dead end south of Brill Drive
       
    19. Decente Drive between Berry Drive and Decente Court
       
    20. Berry Court between Berry Drive and dead end south of Berry Drive
       
    21. Sunshine Court between Berry Drive and dead end south of Sunshine Terrace

      Expansion to include the residential area generally bounded by both sides of the following additional blocks (unless otherwise noted):
       
    22. Big Oak Drive between dead end south of Ventura Boulevard and alley south of Ventura Boulevard
       
    23. Decente Court between Decente Drive and dead end east of Decente Drive
       
    24. Decente Drive between Laurelcrest Drive and Decente Court
       
    25. Laure/crest Ddve between dead end west of Roberts View Place and Berry Drive
       
    26. Berry Drive between Laure!crest Drtve and Laur[e Drfve
       
    27. Blue Canyon Drive between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Picturesque Drive
       
    28. Picturesque Drive between dead end east of Blue Canyon Drive and Sunshine Terrace
       
    29. Sunshine Terrace between Carpenter Avenue and Picturesque Drive
       
    30. Laurelwood Drive between Buena Park Drive and Laurelcrest Drive
       
    31. Blue Canyon Drive between Laurelcrest Drive and Laurelwood Drive/Sunshine Terrace
       
    32. Pastel Place between dead end south of Sunshine Terrace and Sunshine Terrace
       
    33. Roberts View Place between dead end south of Laurelcrest Drive and Laurelcrest Drive
       
    34. Buena Park Drive between dead end south of Sunshine Terrace and Laurelwood Drive
       
    35. Reklaw Drive between Sunshine Terrace and Laurelwood Drive
       
    36. Laurelwood Drive between Carpenter Avenue and Reklaw Drive
       
    37. Carpenter Court between dead end south of Laurelwood Drive and Laurelwood Drive
       
    38. Carpenter Avenue between alley south of Ventura Boulevard and Sunshine Terrace
       
    39. Laurelwood Drive loop west of Carpenter Avenue
       
    40. Laurel Hills Road between dead end east of Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Laurel Canyon Boulevard Laurel Lane between dead end east of Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Laurel Canyon Boulevard
       
    41. Pacoima Court between dead end east of Laurel Canyon Boulevard and Laurel Canyon Boulevard
       
  3. AUTHORIZE the following parking restrictions for use on the residential portions of all streets in PPD No. 276:
    1. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 276 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    2. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 276 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    3. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 276 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    4. NO PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 276 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    5. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 276 PERMITS EXEMPT

       
  4. INSTRUCT the LADOT to initiate the necessary procedures for the preparation and sale of parking permits to residents within PPD No. 276, as specified in LAMC Section 80.58.
     
  5. DIRECT the LADOT to:
     
    1. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions on the residential portions of the street segments enumerated above in Recommendation No. 2, except for areas where parking is currently prohibited in the interest of traffic flow or public safety.
       
    2. Post or remove the authorized parking restrictions upon receipt and validation of petitions containing signatures from at least 75 percent of the dwelling units, covering more than 50 percent of the developed frontage on a street segment requesting installation or removal of the parking restrictions set forth in Recommendation No. 3, without further action of the City Council.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that revenue from the sale of permits will cover the cost of implementing, administering, and enforcing PPD No. 276.  Also, violations of the posted parking restrictions may result in citation fines deposited into the General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(21)
22-0568
CD 10
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONERS, and RESOLUTION relative to the consolidation and conversion of Temporary Preferential Parking District (TPPD) Nos. 87 and 164 to Preferential Parking District (PPD) No. 129 and the expansion of its boundaries in the Pico neighborhood of Council District Ten (CD 10).
   
 
Recommendations for Council action:
  1. FIND that:
     
    1. The consolidation and conversion of TPPD Nos. 87 and 164 to PPD No. 129 and the expansion of its boundaries will provide the residents with greater access to parking within the residential neighborhood.
       
    2. The consolidation and conversion of TPPD Nos. 87 and 164 to PPD No. 129 and the expansion of its boundaries, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) Section 80.58d, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Categorical Exemption, under Article II1.1.a.3 of the 2002 Los Angeles City CEQA Guidelines.
       
  2. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, attached to the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) report dated May 12, 2022, attached to the Council file, consolidating and converting TPPDs No. 87 and 164 to PPD No. 129 and expanding its boundaries, pursuant to the City Council's March 16, 2016, "Rules and Procedures for Preferential Parking Districts," which currently includes both sides (unless specified otherwise) of the following blocks:
     
    1. Orange Grove Avenue between San Vicente Boulevard and Whitworth Drive
       
    2. Orange Grove Avenue between Whitworth Drive and Packard Street
       
    3. Orange Grove Avenue between Packard Street and Pico Boulevard
       
    4. Whitworth Drive between Fairfax Ave and Orange Grove Avenue
       
    5. Whitworth Drive between Orange Grove Avenue and Ogden Drive
       
    6. Whitworth Drive between Ogden Drive and Genesee Avenue
       
    7. Packard Street between Fairfax Ave and Orange Grove Avenue
       
    8. Packard Street between Orange Grove Avenue and Ogden Drive

      Expansion to include the streets within the residential area bounded by:
       
    9. Centerline of Olympic Boulevard between Fairfax Avenue and San Vicente Boulevard
       
    10. Centerline of San Vicente Boulevard between Olympic Boulevard and Ridgeley Drive
       
    11. Ridgeley Drive between San Vicente Boulevard and Pico Boulevard
       
    12. Pico Boulevard between Ridgeley Drive and Fairfax Avenue
       
    13. Centerline of Fairfax Avenue between Pico Boulevard and Olympic Boulevard
  3. AUTHORIZE the "NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM, 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT" restriction for use on the residential portions of the street segments set forth in Recommendation No. 2 above, except where parking is already prohibited for traffic flow or public safety.
     
  4. AUTHORIZE the following alternate restrictions that will become available to post, subject to the receipt and verification of the requisite "petition for posting of alternate parking district restrictions" on the residential portions of all streets in PPD No. 129:
    1. 1 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM, NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    2. 2 HOUR PARKING 7 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    3. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    4. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    5. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    6. 2 HOUR PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM, NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    7. ​​​NO PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    8. NO PARKING 8 AM TO 6 PM, MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    9. NO PARKING 8 AM TO 8 PM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
       
    10. NO PARKING 6 PM TO 8 AM; VEHICLES WITH DISTRICT NO. 129 PERMITS EXEMPT
  5. INSTRUCT the LADOT to:
     
    1. Consolidate and convert TPPDs No. 87 and 164 to PPD No. 129 and expand its boundaries, in accordance with the March 16, 2016, "Rules and Procedures for Preferential Parking Districts."
       
    2. Initiate the necessary procedures for the preparation and sale of parking permits to residents within the boundaries of PPD No. 129, as specified in LAMC Section 80.58.
       
  6. DIRECT the LADOT to post or remove the authorized parking restrictions upon receipt and validation of petitions containing signatures from at least 75 percent of the dwelling units covering more than 50 percent of the developed frontage on a street segment requesting installation or removal of the parking restrictions set forth in Recommendation Nos. 3 and 4, after the consolidation and conversion of TPPD Nos. 87 and 164 to PPD No. 129 and expansion of its boundaries, without further action by the City Council.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The Board reports that revenue from the sale of permits will cover the cost of implementing, administering, and enforcing PPD No. 129. Violations of the posted restrictions may result in citation fines deposited into the General Fund.  Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(22)
15-0315-S7
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (LADOT) and RESOLUTION relative to authority to submit a project for the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Fiscal Year (FY) 2021-22 Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding allocated to the LADOT.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION, attached to the LADOT report dated June 1, 2022, attached to the Council file, for the LCTOP Project, as required by Caltrans.
     
  2. AUTHORIZE the  General Manager, LADOT, to apply for, accept funds, and execute any necessary agreements for FY 2021-22 LCTOP grant funds from Caltrans in an amount up to $1,631,000 for the cost associated with replacing one Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) Commuter Express bus with an electric vehicle and associated charging equipment.
     
  3. AUTHORIZE and APPROPRIATE the funds to be deposited in Fund No. 385 Account No. 94N295 "Commuter Express Fleet Replacement" for the replacement of one CNG Commuter Express bus.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that there is no impact to the City’s General Fund since there is no match for this project. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(23)
22-0658
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (LADOT) relative to the cancellation of the Century City Urban Design and Pedestrian Connection Plan LAF1612.
   
 
Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

AUTHORIZE the LADOT to:
 
  1. Cancel the Century City Urban Design and Pedestrian Connection Plan (Council file No. 06-1080-S2), due to the City determination that the 2007 Call for Projects scope is no longer viable, and request the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority repurpose this amount to an existing City of Los Angeles Call for Project that needs additional funding.
     
  2. Reduce the appropriations in the following Transportation Grant Fund No. 655 accounts as follows: up to $1,614,000 in Account No. 94E242 Century City Urban Design/Pedestrian Construction, and $231,000 in Account No. 9424G2 Century City Urban Design & Pedestrian.
     
  3. Make any corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above instructions, including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of the June 2, 2022 LADOT report, attached to the Council file, and including any corrections and changes to fund or account numbers.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that there is no impact to the General Fund and existing Transportation Grant Fund Appropriations will be reduced. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(24)
22-0659
COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (LADOT) relative to a Stakeholder Structure Partnership Agreement with Community Partners for a Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) Grant in connection with the South Los Angeles Transit Empowerment Zone.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
AUTHORIZE the LADOT and the Bureau of Street Services (BOSS) to:
 
  1. Execute a Stakeholder Structure and Partnership Agreement with Community Partners (required as a condition of the grant) and subject to agreement from the City Attorney.
     
  2. Jointly receive grant funds, in an amount up to $9,177,938.66 from the TCC Program for the purpose of expanding electric vehicle (EV) car share and e-bike library programs, implementing EV charging infrastructure, and installing street improvements.
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The LADOT reports that once Council approves the Stakeholder Structure and Partnership Agreement with Community Partners, the City will be eligible for a grant award from the California Strategic Growth Council and the California Department of Conservation for a total of $9,177,938.66 toward the LADOT and BOSS within the South Los Angeles TCC Program. The LADOT and BOSS identified at least $4,842,535.50 in matching and in-kind resources to support project implementation. The LADOT has identified a total of $332,497.50 of in-kind staff time for matching funds and the BOSS identified a total of $1,944,338. Table 2 of the LADOT report dated June 2, 2022, attached to the Council file, details the leveraged funding and sources for each project. The grant implementation start date is October 2023 and proposed grant end date is October 2028. Projects proposed for this program will continue to support clean transportation, greenhouse gas emission reduction, active transportation, safety, expansion of the nation’s largest EV Car sharing program, and a growing E-Bike Library. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter.)
(25)
22-0008-S4
CD 12
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (LEE – BUSCAINO) relative to prohibiting the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 84 inches in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am along certain street segments in Counicl District 12.
   
 
Recommendation for Counicl action:

RESOLVE to:
  1. Prohibit, pursuant to the Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.4, the parking of vehicles that are in excess of 22 feet in length or over 84 inches in height, during the hours of 2:00 am and 6:00 am along the following street segments:
    1. Both sides of San Fernando Mission Blvd from Lindley Avenue to Zelzah Avenue.
       
    2. North side of Rinaldi Avenue from Zelzah Avenue west to Hesperia Avenue.
       
    3. East side of Louise Avenue from Prairie Street to Dearborn Street.
  2. Direct the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT), upon the adoption of this Resolution, to post signs giving notice of a "tow away, no parking" restriction for oversized vehicles, with the specific hours detailed.
     
  3. AUuthorize the LADOT to make technical corrections or clarifications to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Resolution.
 Financial Policies Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(26)
22-1100-S2
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE CITY CLERK AND CITY ATTORNEY, CERTIFICATION OF SUFFICIENCY, BALLOT RESOLUTIONS, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to an Initiative Petition regarding Funding for Affordable Housing and Tenant Assistance Programs Through a Tax on Real Property Transfers Over $5 Million.
   
 
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. CALL a Special Election to be held not earlier than 110 days nor more than 140 days after Council action on the petition to submit the proposed ordinance, without alteration, to a vote of the electors of the City.

    -OR-
     
  2. DETERMINE to submit the proposed ordinance, without alteration, to a vote of the electors of the City at the next regular City and Statewide election conducted by the County of Los Angeles to be held more than 110 days from the date of Council action (November 8, 2022).
 Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is zero to minimal cost for adopting the recommendation in this report, assuming there will be a Citywide race or a moderate number of Council-sponsored measures on the November ballot. If, however, the City Council chooses to place the measure before the voters on a Special Election, the cost of that Election is estimated to be $12 million. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JUNE 20, 2022(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JUNE 17, 2022)
  (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideraiton of the above matter)
 

Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).