Meeting
|
|
AGENDA
LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
10:00 AM
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER
ROOM 340, CITY HALL
200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012
Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com |
|
President |
GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District |
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District |
PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District |
|
BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District |
|
NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District |
President Pro Tempore |
PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District |
MITCH O’FARRELL, Thirteenth District |
MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District |
|
MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District |
Assistant President Pro Tempore |
CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District |
VACANT |
VACANT, Tenth District |
|
MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District |
|
JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District |
|
KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District |
|
JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District |
|
|
PUBLIC COMMENT
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, and due to concerns over Covid-19, the City Council will take all public comment by teleconference.
CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CABLE TELEVISION CHANNEL 35 AND ON THE INTERNET AT: HTTPS://CLERK.LACITY.ORG/CALENDAR. LIVE COUNCIL MEETINGS CAN ALSO BE HEARD AT: (213) 621-CITY (METRO), (818) 904-9450 (VALLEY), (310) 471-CITY (WESTSIDE) AND (310) 547-CITY (SAN PEDRO AREA)
Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting, press *9 to request to speak.
Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information located on page 2 of this agenda.
Telecommunication Relay Services
Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications.
Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.
What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.
Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.
For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.
SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL
BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES
AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.
Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.
The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.
PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.
The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.
If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or [email protected].
COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.
A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.
VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.
When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.
The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.
RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.
Los Angeles City Council Agenda
Wednesday, February 9, 2022
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM
Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations
| |
|
Multiple Agenda Item Comment
| |
|
Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council
| |
|
Items Noticed for Public Hearing
|
| (1)
|
17-0981 |
|
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, NEGATIVE DECLARATION, ERRATA TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION, and RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS; PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to amending Sections 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, and 19.04 of Chapter 1 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to create the Restaurant Beverage Program (RBP) and the RBP – Alcohol Sensitive Use Zone.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- FIND, that based on the whole of the administrative record, the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301 (Class 1), and California Public Resources Code Section 21080.25, and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies; FIND, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the Negative Declaration, No. ENV-2018-4661-ND, the Errata to Negative Declaration, dated January 4, 2022, and all comments received, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgement and analysis of the City; and, ADOPT the Negative Declaration.
- ADOPT the revised FINDINGS of the PLUM Committee, dated January 11, 2022, attached to the Council file; as the Findings of Council.
- PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying revised ORDINANCE, dated January 21, 2022, amending Sections 12.21, 12.22, 12.24, and 19.04 of Chapter 1 of the LAMC to create the RBP and the RBP – Alcohol Sensitive Use Zone, administrative clearance processes for the sale and dispensing of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption, subject to a set of standards and enforcement procedures, as amended by the PLUM Committee on January 18, 2022 to incorporate technical corrections to replace the term of business tax license in Sections 12.22 A.34(a)(22) and 12.22 A.35(a)(24) with the term of business tax registration certificate.
Case No. CPC-2018-4660-CA
Environmental Nos. ENV-2020-3154-CE and ENV-2018-4661-ND
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the Department of City Planning. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
(Economic Development and Jobs Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
|
|
|
|
Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held
|
| (2)
|
18-0630-S1 |
|
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to extending the master license agreement between the City and Kounkuey Design Initiative by three years, to continue implementation of the Adopt-A-Lot Program.
|
|
|
|
Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez - Buscaino):
INSTRUCT the Department of General Services, with the assistance of the City Administrative Officer (CAO), and in consultation with the City Attorney, to extend the master license agreement between the City and Kounkuey Design Initiative by three years, to continue implementation of the Adopt-A-Lot Program. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
|
|
| (3)
|
21-0009-S5 |
|
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to a new records disposition schedule for the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), Forensic Science Division - Schedule PDX/71.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- APPROVE the new records disposition schedule for the LAPD, Forensic Science Division - Schedule PDX/71.
- FIND that the revision to the records disposition has been processed in accordance with the requirements of Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 12.3.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
|
|
| (4)
|
21-0270 |
|
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to contractor selection in connection with the 2021 Request for Proposals (RFP) for Los Angeles Business Source (LABSC) Operators.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- APPROVE the list of recommended operators selected through the LABSC Operators RFP process as detailed in the January 4, 2022 City Administrative Officer (CAO) report, attached to the Council file.
- AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Economic and Workforce Development Department (EWDD), or designee, to:
- Negotiate and execute contracts with the agencies selected to become LABSC Operators, for the initial period of six months, effective January 1, 2022 through June 30, 2022 with an option to extend for three additional 12-month periods, in substantial conformance with the draft contract attached to the January 4, 2022 CAO report, attached to the Council file and subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, compliance with City’s contracting requirements and federal guidelines, and contingent on available grant funding.
- Establish a LABSC Operator Replacement List to be effective for three years, commencing on January 1, 2021 to include any BSC proposer that attained a score of 70 points or greater, during the 2021 LABSC RFP process.
- Reissue the RFP to select the LABSC Operators for the West Valley Service Area and the South Los Angeles Service Area, and upon completion of the RFP evaluation process to submit recommendations for contractor selections to the City Council and Mayor for review and approval.
- Execute amendments to extend the current contracts for LABSC System Operators for the West Valley and South Los Angeles Service Areas for up to six months, pending the re-issuance of the RFP and operator selection process for those service areas.
- INSTRUCT the EWDD to report to City Council before the selection of a new LABSC operator from the BSC Operator Replacement List.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. The LABSC System will be fully funded by the Community Development Block Grant. These funds are allocated on an annual basis through the Consolidated Plan. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (5)
|
13-0641-S1 |
CD 14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Fashion District (Property-Based) Business Improvement District Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Fashion District (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated January 10, 2022, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Fashion District BID’s Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Fashion District BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (6)
|
15-0094-S1 |
CD 12 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Old Granada Village 2021-2026 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Old Granada Village 2021-2026 BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated January 13, 2022, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Old Granada Village 2021-2026 BID’s Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Old Granada Village 2021-2026 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (7)
|
12-0716-S1 |
CD 4 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Larchmont Village (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Larchmont Village BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 30, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Larchmont Village BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Larchmont Village BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (8)
|
14-0855-S1 |
CD 13 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Hollywood Entertainment District (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Hollywood Entertainment District BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated October 27, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Hollywood Entertainment District BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Hollywood Entertainment District BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (9)
|
12-1168-S2 |
CD 9, CD 14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Greater South Park (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Greater South Park BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 18, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Greater South Park BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Greater South Park BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (10)
|
11-0046-S1 |
CD 2 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the North Hollywood 2020-2024 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the North Hollywood 2020-2024 BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 9, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the North Hollywood 2020-2024 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the North Hollywood 2020-2024 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (11)
|
13-1525-S1 |
CD 14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Arts District LA (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Arts District LA BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 17, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Arts District LA BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Arts District LA BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (12)
|
14-0040-S1 |
CD 11 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Gateway to LA (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Gateway to LA BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 9, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Gateway to LA BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Gateway to LA BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (13)
|
12-0963-S1 |
CD 4, CD 5, CD 13 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Hollywood Media District (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Hollywood Media District (Property-Based) BID attached to the City Clerk report dated November 17, 202, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2021 budget concurs with the intentions of the Hollywood Media District (Property-Based) BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Hollywood Media District (Property-Based) BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (14)
|
12-1543-S1 |
CD 2 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Studio City 2020-2024 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Studio City 2020-2024 BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 5, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Studio City 2020-2024 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Studio City 2020-2024 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (15)
|
14-1515-S1 |
CD 5 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Westwood (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Westwood BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 4, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Westwood BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Westwood BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (16)
|
12-0782-S1 |
CD 5 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Century City (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2021 Annual Planning Report for the Century City BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 1, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Century City BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Century City BID, attached to the Council file, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (17)
|
14-0943-S1 |
|
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2021 Annual Planning Report for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 4, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2021 budget concurs with the intentions of the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2021 Annual Planning Report for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (18)
|
14-0101-S1 |
CD 1, CD 10 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Byzantine Latino Quarter - Pico (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2021 Annual Planning Report for the Byzantine Latino Quarter-Pico BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 4, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Byzantine Latino Quarter - Pico BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2021 Annual Planning Report for the Byzantine Latino Quarter - Pico BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (19)
|
14-0943-S2 |
|
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022) Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 2, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Los Angeles Tourism Marketing District BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (20)
|
17-1306-S1 |
CD 3 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Tarzana Safari Walk (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Tarzana Safari Walk BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 15, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Tarzana Safari Walk BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Tarzana Safari Walk BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (21)
|
12-0139-S1 |
CD 1, CD 8, CD 9 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Figueroa Corridor (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Figueroa Corridor BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 16, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Figueroa Corridor BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Figueroa Corridor BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (22)
|
15-0241-S1 |
CD 14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Downtown Center (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022) Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Downtown Center (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 30, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Downtown Center BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Downtown Center BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (23)
|
09-2013-S1 |
CD 1 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Highland Park 2020-2024 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Highland Park 2020-2024 (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 16, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Highland Park 2020-2024 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Highland Park 2020-2024 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (24)
|
20-0020-S1 |
CD 10 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the West Adams 2021-2025 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the West Adams 2021-2025 (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 30, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the West Adams 2021-2025 (Property-Based) BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the West Adams 2021-2025 (Property-Based) BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (25)
|
18-0429-S1 |
CD 14 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Historic Core (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Historic Core (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 21, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Historic Core BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Historic Core BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (26)
|
15-0460-S1 |
CD 11 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Pacific Palisades 2021-2030 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Pacific Palisades 2021-2030 (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated November 30, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Pacific Palisades 2021-2030 (Property-Based) BI's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT said FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Pacific Palisades 2021-2030 (Property-Based) BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (27)
|
12-0489-S1 |
CD 1 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Chinatown 2021-2025 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Chinatown 2021-2025 (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 21, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Chinatown 2021-2025 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Chinatown 2021-2025 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (28)
|
15-0353 |
CD 11 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Brentwood Village (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Brentwood Village BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 1, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Brentwood Village BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Brentwood Village BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (29)
|
13-0705-S1 |
CD 5 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Melrose (Property-Based) Business Improvement District Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Melrose (Property-Based) BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated January 10, 2022, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Melrose BID’s Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Melrose BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (30)
|
14-0995-S1 |
CD 5 |
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOBS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the Encino Commons 2021-2029 (Property-Based) Business Improvement District (BID) Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Annual Planning Report.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action:
- FIND that:
- The FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Encino Commons 2021-2029 BID, attached to the City Clerk report dated December 7, 2021, attached to the Council file, complies with the requirements of the State Law.
- The increase in the 2022 budget concurs with the intentions of the Encino Commons 2021-2029 BID's Management District Plan and does not adversely impact the benefits received by assessed property owners.
- ADOPT the FY 2022 Annual Planning Report for the Encino Commons 2021-2029 BID, pursuant to the State Law.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that there is no impact to the General Fund associated with this action. Community Impact Statement: None submitted. |
|
|
|
|
|
| (31)
|
22-0051 |
|
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to requesting a report with an overview of Officer Involved Shooting incidents in 2021.
|
|
|
|
Recommendation for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez - Krekorian):
DIRECT the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) to report with an overview of all Officer Involved Shooting incidents in 2021, including the status, timeline, and findings of non-compliance with the LAPD’s Use of Force Policy as compared to findings for the previous five years. Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
|
|
| (32)
|
22-0028 |
|
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to releasing the Los Angeles Police Department’s (LAPD) unreleased body camera footage, 911 calls, radio transmissions, and other recordings related to the December 23, 2021 incident; the status of the internal investigation of the December 23 incident; LAPD policies and practices for pursuing potentially violent suspects in an enclosed space and for protecting and reducing risk to bystanders from an officers’ use of their weapons; and related matters.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Krekorian - De Leon - Rodriguez - Price):
- INSTRUCT the LAPD to release to the public any unreleased body camera footage, 911 calls, radio transmissions and other recordings relating to the December 23, 2021 incident, unedited, immediately.
- INSTRUCT the LAPD to report on the status of (i) the internal investigation of the December 23 incident, including the anticipated time frame for each step in the process, and (ii) the LAPD’s cooperation with the investigation of the incident by the California Attorney General's office and any other investigative agencies.
- INSTRUCT the LAPD to report to the Council on the following:
- How a report of an active shooter is verified, and how appropriate tactics are decided upon when such a report is received.
- The LAPD's policies and practices for pursuing a suspect believed to be an active shooter or otherwise violent in a contained area where victims and bystanders are or may be present.
- The LAPD's policies and practices for protecting victims and bystanders from a suspect believed to be an active shooter or otherwise violent.
- The LAPD's policies and practices for reducing the risk to victims and bystanders from an officer's discharge of weapons.
- The LAPD's policies and practices for the use of rifles in a short-range encounter with a violent person when victims or bystanders may be present, and when less- lethal alternatives may be more appropriate.
- Any changes that have been made in the LAPD's policies and practices in the areas discussed above, or in the training related to those policies and practices, as a result of previous use of firearms in situations where victims or bystanders were at risk of being hit.
- INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst to compile a report on the best practices utilized by other large police departments for reducing the use of lethal force, and for protecting victims and bystanders from risk when such force is used.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
|
|
| (33)
|
22-0041 |
|
HOMELESSNESS AND POVERTY COMMITTEE REPORT relative to developing a strategic action plan to reach a goal of ending family and childhood poverty in the City by 2035; and related matters.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Martinez - Rodriguez - Raman):
- ADOPT a goal of ending family and childhood poverty in the City by 2035; and, INSTRUCT the Community Investment in Families Department (CIFD) to develop a strategic action plan for reaching this goal; with recommendations for a prioritized expansion of current City programs and/or the creation of new programs to achieve this goal.
- INSTRUCT the CIFD to work with the State of California, the County of Los Angeles, and the Los Angeles Unified School District to develop a regional strategy that supports the City’s strategic action plan.
- INSTRUCT the Chief Legislative Analyst (CLA), with assistance from the CIFD and any other relevant departments, to report with a comprehensive list of City programs and efforts aimed at alleviating poverty among families and children across all City departments, identify gaps in services, and develop a way to assess the impact of these programs.
- INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO) and the CLA, in preparation for budget discussions for Fiscal Year 2022-23, to report with a list of anti-poverty policies and programs that have been implemented by the City in response to the pandemic and provide recommendations on the continuation of those efforts beyond the state of emergency.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
(Housing Committee waived consideration of the above matter) |
One or more files are marked confidential or are not available at this time.
|
| (34)
|
22-0078 |
CD 2 |
INFORMATION, TECHNOLOGY, AND GENERAL SERVICES COMMITTEE REPORT relative to negotiating an agreement with the owner(s) of the real property located at 5114 Lankershim Boulevard.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, as initiated by Motion (Krekorian - O'Farrell):
- INSTRUCT the Department of General Services (GSD), with the assistance of the City Attorney and Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA), to negotiate and execute a lease agreement or a purchase and sale agreement with the owner(s) of the real property located at 5114 Lankershim Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 91601, APN No. 2353007019; and, to report to the Council with the purchase price and other terms and conditions of this acquisition.
- INSTRUCT the GSD and DCA to conduct all required due diligence, including but not limited to a Class ''A" appraisal of this property.
- INSTRUCT the City Administrative Officer (CAO), with assistance from GSD, to identify and recommend potential sources of funds for this transaction and to include this information in the GSD report.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the CAO nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)
|
| (35)
|
14-1174-S25 |
|
MOTION (BLUMENFIELD - BUSCAINO) relative to amending Council actions of October 30, 2019 and January 29, 2020 regarding the use of taxable Community Redevelopment Agency/Los Angeles (CRA/LA) Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda / Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area for the Madrid Theater Canoga Park Cultural Arts Hub Project and the Madrid Theater Improvement Project.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- AMEND the Council action of October 30, 2019, relative to approving the use of $175,000 in taxable CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area to the Madrid Theater Canoga Park Cultural Arts Hub Project (Piano Project) (Council file No. 14-1 174-S25) to reduce the approved amount to $151,301.04 and that the balance of $23,698.96 be reverted to its original source.
- AMEND the Council Action of January 29, 2020, relative to approving the use of $2,990,000 in tax-exempt CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area to the Madrid Theater Improvement Project (Improvement Project) (Council file No. 14-1175-S25) to increase the approved amount to $3,013,698.90 by adding $23,698.96 of taxable CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area toward eligible uses previously approved by Council.
- INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department as the administrator of the CRA/LA Excess Bond Proceeds Program take all actions necessary to document and effectuate the changes in the project budgets noted above.
- AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering to prepare Controller instructions to transfer funds related to this matter, make any technical corrections necessary consistent with Council’s actions on this matter; and, authorize the Controller to implement these instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (36)
|
14-1174-S22 |
CD 3 |
MOTION (BLUMENFIELD - BUSCAINO) relative to amending Council actions of November 16, 2018 and October 30, 2019 regarding the use of taxable Community Redevelopment Agency/Los Angeles (CRA/LA) Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda / Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area for the Madrid Theater Canoga Park Cultural Arts Hub Project and the Canoga Park Stage Arts Lab Project.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- AMEND the Council action of November 6, 2018 relative to approving the use of $1,500,000 in taxable CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area to the Madrid Theater Canoga Park Cultural Arts Hub Project (Council file No. 14-1174-S22) to reduce the approved amount to $1,409,380.41 and that the balance of $90,619.59 be reverted to its original source.
- AMEND the Council action of October 30, 2019 relative to approving the use of $175,417 of taxable CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds plus earned interest in the amount of $260,047 available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area toward the Canoga Park Stage Arts Lab Project (Council file No. 14-1174-S22) to increase the approved amount to $526,519.59 by adding $90,619.59 of taxable CRA/LA Excess Non-Housing Bond Proceeds available to Council District Three from the Reseda/Canoga Park Redevelopment Project Area toward eligible uses previously approved by Council.
- INSTRUCT the Economic and Workforce Development Department as the administrator of the CRA/LA Excess Bond Proceeds Program to take all actions necessary to document and effectuate the changes in the budgets noted above.
- AUTHORIZE the Board of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering to prepare Controller instructions to transfer funds related to this matter, make any technical corrections necessary consistent with Council’s actions on this matter; and, AUTHORIZE the Controller to implement these instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (37)
|
22-0011-S1 |
CD 5 |
MOTION (KORETZ - O’FARRELL) relative to funding for work associated with the condemnation proceedings on behalf of the National Boulevard at Clarington Sidewalk project.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $1,000 in the Council District 5 portion of the Street Furniture Revenue Fund No. 430, Department No. 50 to the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Special Fund No. 59V-50, Account No. 50SKYC, for work associated with the condemnation proceedings on behalf of the National Boulevard at Clarington Sidewalk project.
- AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Engineering to make any technical corrections or clarification as necessary to the above instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (38)
|
18-0269-S7 |
CD 14 |
MOTION (DE LEON - KORETZ) relative to accepting funds from Lightstone DTLA, LLC for the purpose of funding homeless services and facilities within the boundaries of Council District 14.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- ACCEPT the sum of $150,000 paid by Lightstone DTLA, LLC, the developer of a project located at 1240-1260 South Figueroa Street and 601 West Pico Boulevard (Planning Case No. ENV-2016-2594-EIR) and Development Agreement dated August 13, 2018 (Contract No. C-131790) implemented by Ordinance No. 185667, and cause this sum to be deposited into the Council District 14 Public Benefits Trust Fund No. 57L-14, for the purpose of funding homeless services and facilities within the boundaries of Council District 14.
- AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (39)
|
18-0269-S6 |
CD 14 |
MOTION (DE LEON - KORETZ) relative to accepting funds from Lightstone DTLA, LLC for the purpose of addressing blight removal, facade improvements, street cleaning, graffiti removal, etc., within Council District 14.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- ACCEPT the sum of $100,000 paid by Lightstone DTLA, LLC, the developer of a project located at 1240-1260 South Figueroa Street and 601 West Pico Boulevard (Planning Case No. ENV-2016-2594-EIR) and Development Agreement dated August 13, 2018 (Contract No. C-131790) approved by Ordinance No. 185667, and cause this sum to be deposited into the Council District 14 Public Benefits Trust Fund No. 57L-14, for the purpose of addressing blight removal, facade improvements, street cleaning, graffiti removal, etc., within Council District 14.
- AUTHORIZE the City Clerk to make any corrections, clarifications or revisions to the above fund transfer instructions, including any new instructions, in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (40)
|
22-0129 |
CD 1 |
MOTION (CEDILLO - DE LEON) and RESOLUTION relative to issuing Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, in an amount not to exceed $24,460,000 to finance the new construction of a 64-unit multifamily housing project known as Oak Apartments located at 2745-2759 Francis Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90005 in Council District 1.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- CONSIDER the results of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA) hearing held on September 17, 2021 for Oak Apartments, attached to the Motion.
- ADOPT the accompanying TEFRA RESOLUTION approving the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed $24,460,000 for the new construction of a 64-unit multifamily housing project located at 2745-2759 Francis Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90005 in Council District 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (41)
|
14-1511-S1 |
CD 10 |
MOTION (MARTINEZ - HARRIS-DAWSON) relative to funding to be used by the Bureau of Street Services for improvements in Little Ethiopia on Fairfax Avenue between Olympic Boulevard and Whitworth Drive in Council District 10.
|
|
|
|
Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
- AUTHORIZE the Controller to accept funds in the amount of $25,000 from the California Community Foundation and deposit these funds in the Street Services Transaction Fund No. 64C/50 for the construction of street improvements on Fairfax Avenue between Olympic Boulevard and Whitworth Drive in Council District 10.
- AUTHORIZE the Controller to appropriate these funds to the Bureau of Street Services, Fund No. 100/86, Account No. 001090 (Salaries, Overtime) in the amount of $10,000, and Account No. 006020 (Operating Supplies) in the amount of $15,000 to perform these improvements.
- AUTHORIZE the Bureau of Street Services to make any technical corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this motion, including any corrections and changes to fund or account numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (42)
|
22-0002-S9 |
|
CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION (Martinez – Raman) relative to establishing the City’s position regarding the Sepulveda Basin Vision Plan and the approval of a state budget request for $3,000,000 in one-time funding for expanding open access and recreational amenities within the Sepulveda Basin Vision Plan.
|
|
|
|
Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:
RESOLVE to include in the City’s 2021-2022 State Legislative Program SUPPORT for the Sepulveda Basin Vision Plan and the approval of a state budget request for $3,000,000 in one-time funding for expanding open access and recreational amenities within the Sepulveda Basin Vision Plan. Community Impact Statement: None submitted |
|
|
|
(Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter) |
|
|
|
Motions for Posting and Referral
| |
|
Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings
| |
|
EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.
Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).