Meeting
  City Logo

REVISED AGENDA

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL

 

REVISED ITEM NO. 6 - COUNCIL FILE NO. 21-0347
    Tuesday, June 8, 2021

10:00 AM


JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER

ROOM 340, CITY HALL

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

Submit written comment at LACouncilComment.com
 
President GILBERT A. CEDILLO, First District
NURY MARTINEZ, Sixth District PAUL KREKORIAN, Second District
  BOB BLUMENFIELD, Third District
  NITHYA RAMAN, Fourth District
President Pro Tempore PAUL KORETZ, Fifth District
JOE BUSCAINO, Fifteenth District MONICA RODRIGUEZ, Seventh District
  MARQUEECE HARRIS-DAWSON, Eighth District
Assistant President Pro Tempore CURREN D. PRICE, JR., Ninth District
VACANT MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS, Tenth District
  MIKE BONIN, Eleventh District
  JOHN S. LEE, Twelfth District
  MITCH O'FARRELL, Thirteenth District
  KEVIN DE LEÓN, Fourteenth District

PUBLIC COMMENT
In conformity with the Governor's Executive Order N-29-20 (March 17, 2020) and due to concerns over COVID-19, the City Council meeting will be conducted entirely telephonically.

CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CABLE TELEVISION CHANNEL 35 AND ON THE INTERNET AT: HTTPS://CLERK.LACITY.ORG/CALENDAR. LIVE COUNCIL MEETINGS CAN ALSO BE HEARD AT: (213) 621-CITY (METRO), (818) 904-9450 (VALLEY), (310) 471-CITY (WESTSIDE) AND (310) 547-CITY (SAN PEDRO AREA)

Members of the public who wish to offer public comment to the Council should call 1 669 254 5252 and use Meeting ID No. 160 535 8466 and then press #. Press # again when prompted for participant ID. Once admitted into the meeting, press *9 to request to speak.

Requests for reasonable modification or accommodation from individuals with disabilities, consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act can be made by contacting the City Clerk's Office at (213) 978-1133. For Telecommunication Relay Services for the hearing impaired, please see the information located on page 2 of this agenda.

Telecommunication Relay Services

Telephone communication is one of the most important forms of communication in society today. Due to advancements in technology, telephone devices have evolved with new services and capabilities. Individuals who are deaf and hard of hearing, and individuals with a speech disability are following these trends and are rapidly migrating to more advanced telecommunications methods, both for peer-to-peer and third-party telecommunications relay service (TRS) communications.

Telecommunications Relay Service is a telephone service that allows persons with hearing or speech disabilities to place and receive telephone calls. TRS is available in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories for local and/or long distance calls. TRS providers - generally telephone companies - are compensated for the costs of providing TRS from either a state or a federal fund. There is no cost to the TRS user.

What forms of TRS are available?There are several forms of TRS, depending on the particular needs of the user and the equipment available: TRS includes: Text to Voice TIY-Based TRS; Speech-to-Speech Relay Service; Shared Non-English Language Relay Service; Captioned Telephone Relay Service; Internet Protocol Relay Service; and Video Relay Service. Please visit this site for detail descriptions, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs.

Don't hang up! Some people hang up on TRS calls because they think the CA is a telemarketer. If you hear, "Hello. This is the relay service .. . " when you pick up the phone, please don't hang up! You are about to talk, through a TRS provider, to a person who is deaf, hard-of-hearing, or has a speech disability.

For more information about FCC programs to promote access to telecommunications services for people with disabilities, visit the FCC's Disability Rights Office website.

SE OFRECE UN SERVICIO DE TRADUCCION AL ESPANOL EN TODAS LAS REUNIONES DEL CONSEJO MUNICIPAL

 

BASIC CITY COUNCIL MEETING RULES

AGENDAS - The City Council meets Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday at 10:00 A.M. The agendas for City Council meetings contain a brief general description of those items to be considered at the meetings. Council Agendas are available in the Office of the City Clerk, Council and Public Services Division, Room 395, City Hall, 200 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, and on the City's website at lacity.org; or lacouncilcalendar.com.

Ten (10) members of the Council constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. The Council may consider an item not listed on the agenda only if it is determined by a two-thirds (10) vote that the need for action arose after the posting of an Agenda. Some items on the agenda may be approved without any discussion, however, any item may be called "special" by a Councilmember. If an item is called "special" it will be "held" until the remainder of the items on the Council agenda have been acted on by the Council. An item may also be called "special" if a member of the public has requested to speak on the item and a public hearing was not previously held.

The City Clerk will announce the items to be considered by the Council, however items will be grouped. For example, all items for which required public hearings have not previously been held are listed in one section on the printed agenda. The Council President will ask if any Councilmember or member or the public wishes to speak on one or more of these items. If anyone wishes to speak on an item, it will be called "special". The remaining items in this section will be voted on by Council with one roll call vote.

PUBLIC INPUT AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS - An opportunity for the public to address the Council on agenda items for which public hearings have not been held will be provided at the time the item is considered or during the Multiple Agenda Item Comment period. Members of the public who wish to speak on items shall be allowed to speak for up to one minute per item up to a total of three minutes per meeting. The Council has determined that a cumulative total of 20 minutes is a reasonable minimum amount of time for the Multiple Agenda Item segment of each regular meeting.

The Council will also provide an opportunity for the public to speak on public interest items. Each speaker shall be limited to one minute of general public comment each regular meeting for a cumulative total of ten (10) minutes. The Council shall not discuss or take action relative to any general public comment.

If you wish to provide documents to the full Council for consideration on an item, please present the Sergeant-At-Arms with 35 copies. Otherwise, your materials will simply be added to the official record.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

NOTICE TO PAID REPRESENTATIVES - If you are compensated to monitor, attend, or speak at this meeting, City law may require you to register as a lobbyist and report your activity. See Los Angeles Municipal Code 48.01 et seq. More information is available at ethics.lacity.org/lobbying. For assistance, please contact the Ethics Commission at (213) 978-1960 or [email protected].

COUNCIL DISCUSSION AND TIME LIMITS - Councilmembers requesting to address the Council will be recognized by the Council President in the order requested. For any item, the Chairperson of the Committee, or the maker of the original motion, or the member calling a matter "special" shall have up to six (6) minutes to discuss the item. All other Councilmembers may speak up to three (3) minutes each on the matter. After all members desiring to speak on a question have had an opportunity to be heard once, the time for each Member desiring to speak again shall be limited to a maximum of three (3) minutes.

A motion calling the "previous question" may be introduced by any member during a Council debate. If adopted, this motion will terminate debate on a matter and the Chair will instruct the Clerk to call the roll on the matter.

VOTING AND DISPOSITION OF ITEMS - Most items require a majority vote of the entire membership of the Council (8 members). Items which have not been discussed in a Council Committee and have been placed directly on the agenda will require 10 votes to consider. Once considered, these items will normally require eight (8) affirmative votes to be adopted. Ordinances require a unanimous vote (at least 12 members must be present) in order to be adopted on first consideration. If an ordinance does not receive the necessary unanimous vote, it is laid over one calendar week. The votes required for approval on second consideration vary and depend upon the type of ordinance, but a typical ordinance requires eight (8) affirmative votes upon second consideration.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

When debate on an item is completed, the Chair will instruct the Clerk to "call the roll". Every member present must vote for or against each item; abstentions are not permitted. The Clerk will announce the votes on each item. Any member of Council may move to "reconsider" any vote on any item on the agenda, except to adjourn, suspend the Rules, or where an intervening event has deprived the Council of jurisdiction, providing that said member originally voted on the prevailing side of the item. The motion to "reconsider" shall only be in order once during the meeting, and once during the next regular meeting. The member requesting reconsideration shall identify for all members present the agenda number, Council file number and subject matter previously voted upon. A motion to reconsider is not debatable and shall require an affirmative vote of eight (8) members of the Council.

When the Council has failed by sufficient votes to approve or reject an item, and has not lost jurisdiction over the matter, or has not caused it to be continued beyond the next regular meeting, the item is continued to the next regular meeting for the purpose of allowing the Council to again vote on the matter.

The City Council rules provide that all items adopted by the Council will not be presented to the Mayor, or other designated officer by the City Clerk until the adjournment of the regular Council meeting following the date of the Council action. A motion to send an item "forthwith" if adopted by ten (10) votes, suspends these rules and requires the City Clerk to forward the matter to the Mayor, or other officer, without delay.

RULE 16 MOTIONS - Council Rule No. 16, in part, allows a member to send an item directly to the Council without it having to go to a Council Committee first, by giving the City Clerk a motion (seconded by an additional member) during a Council session to be placed on the next regular available Council agenda.

 

Los Angeles City Council Revised Agenda
Tuesday, June 8, 2021
JOHN FERRARO COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 340, CITY HALL 200 NORTH SPRING STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 - 10:00 AM

Roll Call

Approval of the Minutes

Commendatory Resolutions, Introductions and Presentations

Multiple Agenda Item Comment

Public Testimony of Non-agenda Items Within Jurisdiction of Council

Items Noticed for Public Hearing

(1)
12-0931
CD 14 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF BALLOT TABULATION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to establishment of the Downtown Industrial District Property and Business Improvement District (District), pursuant to Section 53753 of the California Government Code, Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, if the tabulation of ballots indicates majority support, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated Tuesday, May 18, 2021, establishing the District and confirming the assessments to be levied upon properties within the District, as described in the Management District Plan.
  2. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to approval of the City Attorney, to prepare, execute and administer an operating agreement between the City and a non-profit corporation for the administration of the District’s programs.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that direct costs associated with Department administrative expenses will be charged to the District and will be recovered from assessments collected.

Assessment levied on the City-owned properties within the District to be paid from the General Fund total $29,793.79 for the first year of the District. Funding is available in the Business Improvement District Trust Fund 659 to pay the General Fund share of the assessment for the first operating year. 

Proposition 218 requires the separation of general benefits from the special benefits. The general benefit portion for the Downtown Industrial District Business Improvement District is $102,686.84 for the first year. However, funds other than assessment revenue must be budgeted annually for the general benefit expense for the remaining years of the District’s five-year term.
 
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Pursuant to Council action on Tuesday, June 1, 2021 and adoption of Ordinance No. 186961 on April 6, 2021)
 
(2)
13-0199
CDs 4, 13 PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT OF BALLOT TABULATION and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to establishment of the East Hollywood Property and Business Improvement District (District), pursuant to Section 53753 of the California Government Code, Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code and Article XIII D of the California Constitution.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, if the tabulation of ballots indicates majority support, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated Tuesday, May 18, 2021, establishing the District and confirming the assessments to be levied upon properties within the District, as described in the Management District Plan.
  2. AUTHORIZE the City Clerk, subject to approval of the City Attorney, to prepare, execute and administer an operating agreement between the City and a non-profit corporation for the administration of the District’s programs.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Clerk reports that direct costs associated with Department administrative expenses will be charged to the District and will be recovered from assessments collected.

Assessment levied on the City-owned properties within the District to be paid from the General Fund total $25,268.90 for the first year of the District. Funding is available in the Business Improvement District Trust Fund 659 to pay the General Fund share of the assessment for the first operating year. 

Proposition 218 requires the separation of general benefits from the special benefits. The general benefit portion for the East Hollywood Business Improvement District is $11,464.00 for the first year. However, funds other than assessment revenue must be budgeted annually for the general benefit expense for the remaining years of the District’s ten-year term
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Pursuant to Council action on Tuesday, June 1, 2021 and adoption of Ordinance No. 186962 on April 6, 2021)
 
(3)
21-0424
CD 6 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION and PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to the name of the private driveways on Plummer Street between Natick Avenue and Cedros Avenue be established as Corterra Lane, Corbin Lane, and Cortez Lane.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. FIND that the name establishment is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City’s Environmental Guidelines.
     
  2. FIND that the name of the private driveways on Plummer Street between Natick Avenue and Cedros Avenue, shown on Exhibit A of the City Engineer report dated April 6, 2021, attached to the Council file, be established as Corterra Lane, Corbin Lane, and Cortez Lane (Private Driveways).
     
  3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit the Council’s action on this matter to:
     
    1. The Board of Supervisors, County of Los Angeles, pursuant to Section 34092 of the Government Code.
       
    2. The Los Angeles Department of Transportation, City-wide Investigation Section.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that the Bureau of Engineering is absorbing the cost of processing the request in the approximate amount of $4,628.82. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(4)
21-0501
CD 14 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of the easement for storm drain purposes lying on 3401 East 1st Street - Right of Way No. 36000-2260 (Quitclaim).
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines.
     
  2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the quitclaim of the 6-foot wide easement for storm drain purposes lying on 3401 East 1st Street shown crosshatched on Exhibit "A" on the May 5, 2021 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition:

    That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Group of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated April 27, 2021 authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney.
     
  4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(5)
21-0500
CD 13 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY ENGINEER and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to the quitclaim of the easement for public transit shelter purposes lying on 4712 Santa Monica Boulevard - Right of Way No. 36000-2265 (Quitclaim).
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND that the Quitclaim is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 pursuant to Article III, Class 5(4) of the City's Environmental Guidelines.
     
  2. APPROVE the petitioner’s request for the quitclaim of the 3-foot wide easement for public transit shelter purposes lying on 4712 Santa Monica Boulevard shown crosshatched on Exhibit "A" on the May 5, 2021 City Engineer report, attached to the Council file, subject to the following condition:

    That petitioner make satisfactory arrangement with the Real Estate Group of the Bureau of Engineering (BOE) with respect to the payment of the document recording fee.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE dated April 27, 2021 authorizing the Quitclaim, which has been approved as to form and legality by the City Attorney.
     
  4. INSTRUCT the Real Estate Division of the BOE record and deliver the necessary quitclaim deed or deeds to the persons legally entitled thereto.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The City Engineer reports that a fee of $7,075.91 was paid for processing this request pursuant to Section 7.40 of the Los Angeles Administrative Code. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(6)
21-0347
CD 10 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF HEARING COMMENTS relative to an Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at Dal ay Restaurant, located at 3377 Wilshire Boulevard, Space 200.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
 
  1. DETERMINE that the issuance of a liquor license at Dal ay Restaurant, located at 3377 Wilshire Boulevard, Space 200, will serve the Public Convenience or Necessity and will not tend to create a law enforcement problem.

  2. GRANT the Application for Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at Dal ay Restaurant, located at 3377 Wilshire Boulevard, Space 200.

  3. INSTRUCT the City Clerk to transmit this determination to the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control as required findings under Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4.

Applicant: Eun Yung YooRepresentative: Eric Yu
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JUNE 28, 2021(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JUNE 25, 2021)
  (Continued from Council meeting of May 11, 2021)

Items for which Public Hearings Have Been Held

(7)
21-0174
CD 14 CONTINUED CONSIDERATION OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (MND), MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP), MITIGATION MEASURES, and RELATED CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS; PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT, and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to a Zone Change for the properties located at 2520 North Eastern Avenue (2532, 2608, and 2668 North Eastern Avenue, and 2647-2651 North Lombardy Boulevard).
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
 
  1. FIND, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074(b), after consideration of the whole of the administrative record, including the MND, No. ENV-2015-1918-MND, and all comments received, with the imposition of the mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; FIND that the MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; FIND that the mitigation measures have been made enforceable conditions on the project; and, ADOPT the MND and the MMP prepared for the MND.
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the East Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (ELAAPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated May 13, 2020, effectuating a Zone Change on the project site from [Q]R1-1D and [Q]RD6-1D to (T)(Q)RD5-1D, pursuant to Section 12.32 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC), for the construction, use, and maintenance of 42 small lot homes on the approximately 218,270 square-foot lot; the small lot homes will have approximately 2,000 square feet of floor area and a maximum height of 26 feet; two parking spaces per dwelling unit to be located in garages attached to each small lot home will be provided, and up to 38 small lot homes have been designed to accommodate two additional parking spaces within each of the driveways in addition to the two required parking spaces, providing off-site options for residence and their guests; access to 38 of the small lot homes will be provided through a common access driveway accessible from Eastern Avenue, while the remaining four small lot homes will be accessible from a common access driveway from Lombardy Boulevard; the project will require the removal of 39 of 102 protected trees (Black Walnut trees) located on the site, and the grading and export of approximately 78,000 cubic yards of dirt; for the properties located at 2520 North Eastern Avenue (2532, 2608, and 2668 North Eastern Avenue and 2647-2651 North Lombardy Boulevard), subject to Conditions of Approval.
     
  4. ADVISE the applicant, pursuant to LAMC Section 12.32 G:

    ...property shall not remain in a Q Qualified classification for more than six years unless during that time: (1) there is substantial physical development of the property to allow for one or more of the uses for which the Q Qualified classification was adopted; or (2) if no physical development is necessary, then the property is used for one or more of the purposes for which the Q Qualified classification was adopted... When these time limitations expire, the Q Qualified classification and the authority contained therein shall become null and void, the rezoning proceedings shall be terminated, and the property thereafter may only be utilized for those purposes permitted prior to the commencement of such rezoning proceedings.
     
  5. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City shall monitor or require evidence that mitigation conditions are implemented and maintained throughout the life of the project, and the City may require any necessary fees to cover the cost of such monitoring.
     
  6. ADVISE the applicant that, pursuant to State Fish and Game Code Section 711.4, a Fish and Game Fee and/or Certificate of Fee Exemption is now required to be submitted to the County Clerk prior to or concurrent with the Environmental Notice of Determination filing.
Applicant: TTLC Los Angeles - EL Sereno, LLC

Representatives: Rob Flitton, The True Life Companies (TTLC) Management, Inc. and Jim Ries, Craig Lawson and Co., LLC

Case No. APCE-2015-2048-ZC-ZAD-ZAA

Environmental No. ENV-2015-1918-MND
Fiscal Impact Statement: The ELAAPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Continued from Council meeting of May 26, 2021)
(8)
20-1125
STATUTORY EXEMPTION FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) and PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT (PLUM) COMMITTEE REPORT relative to amending Sections 105.01, 105.02, and 105.03 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to modify and add definitions, location restrictions, and sensitive site dating provisions related to commercial cannabis activity in the City, and provisions governing the continuing operation of existing medical marijuana dispensaries.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:​
 
  1. FIND, based on the whole of the administrative record, that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Business and Professions Code Section 26055(h), on the basis that the project will adopt ordinances, rules and/or regulations, that will require discretionary review under CEQA to approve licenses to engage in commercial cannabis activity in the City (ENV-2019-6204-SE).
     
  2. ADOPT the FINDINGS of the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (LACPC) as the Findings of Council.
     
  3. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present the Ordinance amending LAMC Sections 105.01, 105.02, and 105.03 to modify and add definitions, location restrictions, and sensitive site dating provisions related to commercial cannabis activity in the City, and provisions governing the continuing operation of existing medical marijuana dispensaries; and, include an Urgency Clause in the draft Ordinance to be transmitted for the Council’s consideration, in accordance with the amendments proposed by the Department of Cannabis Regulation (DCR) included in Attachment B of the revised DCR report dated May 27, 2021, attached to the Council file, with the following amendment:
     
    1. Under Section 2, strike out the suggested changes and keep the original definition of Permanent Supportive Housing in LAMC Section 105.01, keeping drug treatment as part of the definition.

Case No. CPC-2019-6203-CA

Environmental No. ENV2019-6204-SE
Fiscal Impact Statement:
None submitted by the DCR. The LACPC reports that there is no General Fund impact as administrative costs are recovered through fees.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(9)
21-0568
PLANNING AND LAND USE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT relative to proposed amendments to Sections of Article 4, Chapter X of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to streamline and clarify commercial cannabis procedures, create a more equitable process for Social Equity Applicants, and revise the Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) process to require a land use review of PCN requests.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:​
 
  1. APPROVE the amendments to Sections 104.00, 104.01, 104.03, 104.05, 104.06, 104.06.1, 104.07, 104.12, 104.13, 104.14, 104.19, and 104.20 of Article 4, Chapter X of the LAMC, proposed by the Department of Cannabis Regulation (DCR) in the revised DCR report dated May 27, 2021, attached to the Council file.
     
  2. REQUEST the City Attorney to prepare and present the Ordinance to amend Article 4, Chapter X of the LAMC in accordance with the proposed amendments included in Attachment A of the revised DCR report dated May 27, 2021, attached to the Council file; and, include an Urgency Clause in the draft Ordinance to be transmitted for the Council’s consideration.
Fiscal Impact Statement:
None submitted by the DCR. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the City Attorney has completed a financial analysis of this report.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(10)
18-0968-S2
HOUSING COMMITTEE REPORT relative to authority to execute 16 new agreements with eight nonprofit agencies, four housing authorities, and one fiscal monitor to administer the Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) Program; and, to execute a First Amendment to Contract No. C-138232 with the Alliance for Housing and Healing for the continued provision of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act Short Term Rent, Mortgage, and Utility (STRMU) assistance.
   
  Recommendations for Council actions, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR: 
  1. AUTHORIZE the General Manager, Los Angeles Housing and Community Investment Department (HCIDLA), or designee, to: 
     
    1. Execute agreements with the contractors listed in Table One of the City Administrative Officer (CAO) report dated May 20, 2021, attached to the Council File, to administer the HOPWA Program with compensation amounts not to exceed the amounts listed for each contractor and a contract term of one year from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, with an option to extend for two additional one-year terms, in substantial conformance with the draft Agreements attached to the above mentioned report, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements and federal requirements. 
       
    2. Execute sole source agreements with the four housing authorities listed in Table Two of the above mentioned report to provide tenant-based rental assistance (TBRA) under the HOPWA Program with compensation amounts not to exceed the amounts listed for each contractor and a contract term of one year from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, with an option to extend for two additional one-year terms, in substantial conformance with the draft TBRA Agreement attached to the above mentioned report, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements and federal requirements. 
       
    3. Execute a First Amendment to Contract No. C-138232 with the Alliance for Housing and Healing for the continued provision of short term rent, mortgage, and utility assistance services under the HOPWA program, to extend the term of the agreement by 12 months for a new end date of September 30, 2022, in substantial conformance  with the draft First Amendment attached to the above mentioned report, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality, and compliance with the City’s contracting requirements and federal requirements. 
       
  2. REQUIRE that HCIDLA complete the following actions prior to execution of the proposed HOPWA TBRA agreements: 
     
    1. Complete the Charter Section 1022 Determination process.
       
    2. Ensure contract compliance documentation are submitted and, if applicable, uploaded onto the Business Assistance Virtual Network (BAVN). 
       
    3. Coordinate with the Department of Public Works Bureau of Contract Administration for the verification of submitted compliance documentation or for confirmation of exemption from the required documentation. 
Fiscal Impact Statement: The CAO reports that there is no impact to the General Fund. Funding for the proposed new agreements will be provided by the HOPWA entitlement grant included in the Program Year 47 Consolidated Plan. Financial Policies Statement: The CAO reports that the recommendations in this report are in compliance with the City's Financial Policies in that the City's financial obligation is limited to funds budgeted for this purpose according to the City's Standard Provisions. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 
(11)
17-1115
TRANSPORTATION AND TRADE, TRAVEL, AND TOURISM COMMITTEES REPORT and ORDINANCE FIRST CONSIDERATION relative to requiring the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) to obtain prior Council approval prior to restricting a street for tour bus operations.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:

PRESENT and ADOPT the accompanying ORDINANCE, dated August 3, 2020, relative to amending Subsection (a) of Section 80.36.11 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) to require that the LADOT obtain Council's approval prior to restricting a street for tour bus operations.
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the City Attorney. Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has submitted a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(12)
21-0407
ARTS, PARKS, HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE REPORT relative to Neighborhood Council election rules and systems.
   
  Recommendations for Council action, pursuant to Motion (Rodriguez – Cedillo):
 
  1. INSTRUCT the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment to report with a survey of Neighborhood Council election rules, with an analysis on how the by-laws of different Neighborhood Councils vary on election issues, including, but not limited to: eligibility requirements for Board seats, governing board structure, stakeholder requirements, and stakeholder verification.
     
  2. REQUEST the City Attorney to report on the Council's authority to standardize election rules across Neighborhood Councils, and potential limits to this authority.
     
  3. DIRECT the City Clerk to report on the costs associated with administering the existing non-standardized Neighborhood Council election systems, and provide recommendations for streamlining a Neighborhood Council elections, and potential cost savings that could result from standardizing Neighborhood Council election rules.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
 

Items for which Public Hearings Have Not Been Held - (10 Votes Required for Consideration)

(13)
21-0005-S84
CD 14 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY INVESTMENT DEPARTMENT (HCIDLA) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 2622 East Michigan Avenue (Case No. 637526) Assessor I.D. No. 5180-010-031 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
 
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the HCIDLA report recommendation dated May 25, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 2622 East Michigan Avenue (Case No. 637526) Assessor I.D. No. 5180-010-031 from the REAP.
 
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the HCIDLA.  Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
 
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(14)
21-0005-S85
CD 15 COMMUNICATION FROM THE LOS ANGELES HOUSING AND COMMUNITY INVESTMENT DEPARTMENT (HCIDLA) and RESOLUTION relative to removing the property at 16223 West Menlo Avenue (Case No. 650575) Assessor I.D. No. 6120-017-035 from the Rent Escrow Account Program (REAP).
 
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

APPROVE the HCIDLA report recommendation dated May 25, 2021, attached to the council file and ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION removing the property at 16223 West Menlo Avenue (Case No. 650575) Assessor I.D. No. 6120-017-035 from the REAP.
 
Fiscal Impact Statement: None submitted by the HCIDLA.  Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the Chief Legislative Analyst has completed a financial analysis of this report.
 
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
 
(15)
21-0589
CD 12 MOTION (LEE – RODRIGUEZ) relative to funding for tree services in Council District 12 coordinated by the Northridge West Neighborhood Council.
 
   
  Recommendations for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE MAYOR:
  1. TRANSFER and APPROPRIATE $5,500 in the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment's (DONE) appropriation account for Northridge West Neighborhood Council, Fund No. 59B Account No. 141257, Department 14 to the Bureau of Street Services Fund No. 100/86, Account No. 001090 for tree services in Council District 12 coordinated by the Northridge West Neighborhood Council.
  2. AUTHORIZE the DONE and Bureau of Street Services to make any technical corrections or clarifications to the above fund transfer instructions in order to effectuate the intent of this Motion.
 
 
(16)
21-0590
MOTION (BLUMENFIELD – BUSCAINO) relative to extending the existing contract for the production of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) with All American Asphalt (C-127608).
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the Department of Public Works, Bureau of Street Services (StreetsLA), to extend the existing contract for the production of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) with All American Asphalt (C-127608) on a month-to-month basis for up to nine months. 
 
 
 
(17)
14-0438
CD 11 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDING and COMMUNICATION FROM THE BOARD OF AIRPORT COMMISSIONERS (BOAC) relative to amending the Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) contract with ABM Aviation, Inc.
   
  Recommendations for Council action:
  1. ADOPT the determination by the BOAC that the proposed action is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).
     
  2. APPROVE the Second Amendment to LAWA Agreement DA-4891 with ABM Aviation, Inc., to add a month-to-month term extension, not to exceed five months, from August 1, 2021, through December 31, 2021, and to increase the contract authority by $7,800,000, for new total not to exceed $65,900,000, for the operation and management of remote employee parking at Los Angeles International Airport.
     
  3. CONCUR with the action taken by the BOAC on April 22, 2021, by Resolution No. 27246, authorizing the Chief Executive Officer, LAWA, to execute the Second Amendment to Agreement DA-4891 with ABM Aviation, Inc.
Fiscal Impact Statement: The BOAC reports that this action will not impact the General Fund. Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
  TIME LIMIT FILE - JUNE 28, 2021(LAST DAY FOR COUNCIL ACTION - JUNE 23, 2021)
  (Trade, Travel, and Tourism Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(18)
19-0464
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (BUSCAINO – LEE) relative to amending prior Council action of June 26, 2019 regarding parking fines for trailers, semitrailers, and commercial vehicles on City streets.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AMEND Council action of June 26, 2019, relative to increasing parking fines for trailers, semitrailers, and commercial vehicles on City streets (C.F. 19-0464) to include the following revisions and additional provisions to the proposed ordinance:
  1. Make it unlawful to park or leave standing an unhitched commercial trailer upon any major highway, secondary highway, or collector street in the City where the Los Angeles Department of Transportation has posted signs providing notice of this restriction.
     
  2. Include definitions for “Operator” and “Commercial Trailer.”
     
  3. Revise the civil penalties to include a first violation ($500), second occurring within 12 months of the first violation ($750), a third and any subsequent violation occurring within 12 months of the first violation ($1,000).
     
  4. Add a section that states that an Operator of a commercial trailer parked in violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code Section 80.69.2 shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during which any violation of this section is committed, continued, permitted by the Operator.
     
  5. Add severability language to ensure that if any section is held unconstitutional or invalid or unenforceable, the remaining portions will remain in full force and effect.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(19)
21-0597
CONSIDERATION OF MOTION (RAMAN - KREKORIAN – KORETZ) relative to a Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADOT) agreement with Heritage Housing Partners for the purchase of two battery-electric buses.
   
  Recommendation for Council action:

AUTHORIZE the General Manager, LADOT, or designee, to execute a cooperative agreement with Heritage Housing Partners to purchase two battery-electric buses for the Commuter Express 549 in support of an application for funding and in accordance with Sustainable Transportation Improvements portion of the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to form and legality.
Community Impact Statement: None submitted.
 
  (Transportation Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(20)
21-0002-S126
COMMUNICATION FROM CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST (CLA) AND  RESOLUTION (RIDLEY-THOMAS – RAMAN – CEDILLO – KORETZ) relative to establishing the City's position in its 2021-2022 Federal Legislative Program regarding any legislation or administrative action that would provide a significant increase in rental assistance resources and related matters.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:

ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021-2022 Federal Legislative Program SUPPORT and/or SPONSORSHIP of any legislation or administrative action that would provide a significant increase in rental assistance resources, including the allocation of more project based vouchers, which are necessary to sustainably address the homelessness crisis and ensure there is an equitable allocation of long-term affordable housing across Los Angeles.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analyst of this report.
 
  (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(21)
21-0002-S107
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST (CLA) and RESOLUTION (KREKORIAN – MARTINEZ) relative to establishing the City's position in its 2021-2022 State Program regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 773 (Nazarian), which would authorize local authorities to make temporary Slow Streets programs permanent.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:

ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021-2022 State Legislative Program SUPPORT for AB 773 (Nazarian), which would authorize local authorities to make temporary Slow Streets programs permanent.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report.
 
  (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(22)
21-0002-S91
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST (CLA) and RESOLUTION (O’FARRELL – KORETZ – KREKORIAN – BLUMENFIELD) relative to establishing the City's position in its 2021-2022 State Legislative Program regarding Assembly Bill (AB) 478 (Ting), AB 649 (Bennett), and AB 881 (Gonzalez), which seek to promote good recycling initiatives and practices.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:

ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021-2022 State Legislative Program SUPPORT for AB 478 (Ting), AB 649 (Bennett), and AB 881 (Gonzalez), which seek to promote good recycling initiatives and practices.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes

For: 
Westside Neighborhood Council
 
  (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)
(23)
21-0002-S87
COMMUNICATION FROM THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST (CLA) and RESOLUTION (O’FARRELL – KORETZ – KREKORIAN – BLUMENFIELD) relative to mitigating the effects of "greenwashing" which is the practice of placing deceptive, exaggerated, or misleading labels on products to make them appear environmentally-friendly.
   
  Recommendation for Council action, SUBJECT TO THE CONCURRENCE OF THE MAYOR:

ADOPT the accompanying RESOLUTION to include in the City’s 2021-2022 State Legislative Program SUPPORT for SB 343 (Allen), AB 1201 (Ting), and AB 818 (Bloom)177which seeks to mitigate the effects of "greenwashing" which is the practice of placing deceptive, exaggerated, or misleading labels on products to make them appear environmentally-friendly.
Fiscal Impact Statement: Neither the City Administrative Officer nor the CLA has completed a financial analysis of this report. Community Impact Statement: Yes

For:
Westside Neighborhood Council
 
  (Rules, Elections, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee waived consideration of the above matter)

Items Called Special

Motions for Posting and Referral

Council Members' Requests for Excuse from Attendance at Council Meetings

Adjourning Motions

Council Adjournment

EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES - If you challenge a City action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to, the public hearing. Any written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk before the City Council's final action on a matter will become a part of the administrative record.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.5 - If a Council action is subject to judicial challenge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.5, be advised that the time to file a lawsuit challenging a final action by the City Council is limited by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6 which provides that the lawsuit must be filed no later than the 90th day following the date on which the Council's action becomes final.

Materials relative to items on this agenda can be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk's Council File Management System, at lacouncilfile.com by entering the Council File number listed immediately following the item number (e.g., 00-0000).